Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Article #398Re: load balancing using IGRP
From: Robert W. Fletcher Jr.
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 1990 19:05
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 1990 19:05
19 lines
951 bytes
951 bytes
>> > The problem as I see it is the ip route-cache. >> >> You're right. We adivise customers with slow serial lines to turn off >> the cache. 56KB definitely qualifies as slow in this context. >> >> > Route-caching may be disabled on an interface basis, >> > but this does not affect the contents of the cache. >> >> This looks kind of bug-like. I'll see about getting it fixed. The command no ip route-cache invalidates the cache -- we do not purge/flush the entries. The stale entry will be flushed 30 minutes later. Valid ip cache entries are flaged with an *, on the show ip cache output. Fletcher
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<19525@boulder.Colorado.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!boulder!daemonShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!boulder!daemon From: rwf@cisco.com (Robert W. Fletcher Jr.) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco Subject: Re: load balancing using IGRP Message-ID: <19525@boulder.Colorado.EDU> Date: 10 Apr 90 19:05:47 GMT Sender: daemon@boulder.Colorado.EDU Lines: 19