🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Article #490

Re: Tacacs questions ?

#490
From: WilliamChops Westfield
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 1990 21:53
32 lines
1570 bytes
    * What happens if a tacacs server can't be found ?  Can I still get
      in somehow ?  How about on the console ?

If you don't define a tacacs server, you can always get in.  This is
sort of a way to get usernames on the terminal server without having
to implement a tacacs server.

If all of the tacacs servers are dead, you don't get in, even on the
console.  The next release will have this configurable; you can have
it either requests the "enable" password (console password or enable
password), or simply succeed.


    * Is there an RFC on the protocol ?

No.  Not a published one anyway.  It is the "standard" TACACS protocol
used by the MilNet/ARPANet TACS, but the standard has not been published
(not even as an RFC), and I think cisco is about the only one using it.
The tacacs server code we supply is about the best documentation you can
get.  8.2 extends the protocol quite a bit, getting you some extra
capabilities - this spec might get published by cisco.


    * Can tacacs be used for the "enable-password" in any way ?

This is one of the features you get in 8.2 using the "extended" TACACS
features.  There is no way to do this in any currently shipping software.

Bill Westfield
cisco Systems.
-------
Technical Details
Message-ID: <23768@boulder.Colorado.EDU>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!rex!ames!ncar!boulder!daemon

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!rex!ames!ncar!boulder!daemon
From: BILLW@mathom.cisco.com (WilliamChops Westfield)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Subject: Re: Tacacs questions ?
Message-ID: <23768@boulder.Colorado.EDU>
Date: 21 Jul 90 21:53:05 GMT
Sender: daemon@boulder.Colorado.EDU
Lines: 32