Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Article #549Re: PPP?
From: Daniel Karrenberg
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 1990 12:30
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 1990 12:30
24 lines
893 bytes
893 bytes
CISCO should suport PPP on the whole line sync/async router/terminal server as soon as possible and make clear statements on when what is expected to become available. Anything else will make customers unhappy and be counterproductive for CISCO. My priorities are sync - router async - terminal server (for talking to TS users) sync - terminal server (for attaching the server) Since sync-router and sync-server are the same as far as implementation is concerned this comes down to: do sync first, then async. Daniel PS: Of course customers ask everyting .... :-)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<24783@boulder.Colorado.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!dimacs.rutgers.edu!rutgers!ub!boulder!daemonShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!dimacs.rutgers.edu!rutgers!ub!boulder!daemon From: dfk@cwi.nl (Daniel Karrenberg) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco Subject: Re: PPP? Message-ID: <24783@boulder.Colorado.EDU> Date: 15 Aug 90 12:30:56 GMT Sender: daemon@boulder.Colorado.EDU Lines: 24