Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Article #644Re: CSC/3 vs. CSC/2 processor
From: Charles Hedrick
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 1990 02:42
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 1990 02:42
6 lines
860 bytes
860 bytes
I've already commented on this before to people within cisco, but it's probably worth adding my voice to the public comments. A number of our departments recently finished upgrading from CSC1's to CSC2's. It is too soon to be forcing them into another upgrade, particularly to a system that is not expandable. I would strongly suggest the use of SIMM's or something similar.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Sep.8.22.42.05.1990.7395@athos.rutgers.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!dimacs.rutgers.edu!aramis.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!hedrickReferences:
<25834@boulder.Colorado.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!dimacs.rutgers.edu!aramis.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!hedrick From: hedrick@athos.rutgers.edu (Charles Hedrick) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco Subject: Re: CSC/3 vs. CSC/2 processor Message-ID: <Sep.8.22.42.05.1990.7395@athos.rutgers.edu> Date: 9 Sep 90 02:42:07 GMT References: <25834@boulder.Colorado.EDU> Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 6