Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Article #703Re: 2 v.35 won't fit on small box
From: bruce
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 1990 04:52
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 1990 04:52
16 lines
1233 bytes
1233 bytes
In article <32254.26ecffbd@ccavax.camb.com>, bruce@ccavax.camb.com writes: > In the interest of being able to use a small (and MUCH less expensive) > cisco box, but to also use a dual port serial line card, we opted for > the rs-422 interface. It would be 'nice' if a wide selection of CSU/DSUs > all came with the rs-422 interface, but they don't. > ... > cisco's packaging cost me needless money and hassle. > I wonder what cisco suggests for someone in the position I was in? Do they > even care about such issues? After posting that I got a prompt detailed answer from cisco. They seem to have chosen to not publicly detail their future connector plans, so I won't copy the mail here. I had initially assumed the answer would arrive here, but since it hasn't, I am posting this. I was quite pleased with the response, and obviously they do care!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<32562.26f41e54@ccavax.camb.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!cmcl2!uupsi!ccavax!bruceReferences:
<32254.26ecffbd@ccavax.camb.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!cmcl2!uupsi!ccavax!bruce From: bruce@ccavax.camb.com Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco Subject: Re: 2 v.35 won't fit on small box Message-ID: <32562.26f41e54@ccavax.camb.com> Date: 17 Sep 90 04:52:36 GMT References: <32254.26ecffbd@ccavax.camb.com> Organization: Cambridge Computer Associates, Inc. Lines: 16