Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Article #73proxy-rip, or something better.
From: Brian H. Powell
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1992 21:59
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1992 21:59
23 lines
1343 bytes
1343 bytes
This is an easy question, that exhibits my ignorance of simpler, better
way to do what I want to do.
We're setting up two cisco IGS's to simulate a proposed international
network link. Here's approximately the picture (subnet mask 255.255.255.0):
130.164.1.0 <-ethernet-> cisco1 <-x25-> cisco2 <-ethernet-> 130.164.2.0
^^^ 130.164.3.0
^^^^^^^^^^^ access to rest of Internet
In cisco2, we just set up a default route that points to cisco1. But we
want cisco1 to be able to advertise to all the other 130.164.x.0 subnets the
existence of 130.164.2.0. It seems to just advertise 130.164.3.0.
Note that we don't want or need to have routing information routinely
passed over the X.25 link. A very-low overhead or static routing mechanism is
preferred.
Note also that eventually, cisco1 will be an AGS+ with several serial
ports, supporting several connections to remote places.
Any suggestions?
Please respond by mail. Thanks.
Brian
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug3.215954.781@natinst.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!natinst.com!brianShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!natinst.com!brian From: brian@natinst.com (Brian H. Powell) Subject: proxy-rip, or something better. Message-ID: <1992Aug3.215954.781@natinst.com> Organization: National Instruments, Austin, TX Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1992 21:59:54 GMT Lines: 23