Re: 9.0(1) stability

Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco

Article #93

Back to comp.dcom.sys.cisco Previous Next

#93

From: fred
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1992 13:45

15 lines
949 bytes

Tom,

We have had an AGS/4 with 9.0(1) in limited service for about 3 weeks
using IP with secondary addressing, AppleTalk with a complex topology,
DecNet IV, and bridging LAT, MOP, and NetBios.  We have had no problems
yet.... But my experience with early revs makes me nervous.  We
developed a fall back plan before we installed the unit and I think
that is only prudent. My advice is to move ahead but with all possible
caution.  Let me know if anything bites you.

Fred J. Gray
Network Engineer
Teledyne Brown Engineering
fred@nebula.tbe.com
205.726.5341

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9208051345.AA01128@nebula.tbe.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!boulder!recnews

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!boulder!recnews
From: fred@nebula.tbe.com
Subject: Re: 9.0(1) stability 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 04 Aug 92 10:15:18 EDT."
             <9208041515.AC00045@adam.WEBO.DG.COM> 
Message-ID: <9208051345.AA01128@nebula.tbe.com>
Sender: news@colorado.edu
Date: 05 Aug 92 08:45:59 -0500
X-Mts: smtp
Lines: 15