🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <584klp$2d5@panix3.panix.com>,
danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com> wrote:
>In <584daj$r7q1@nwnews.wa.com> phaedrus@chinook.halcyon.com (Phaedrus) writes:
>>Are you prepared to have
>>to present ID every time you want to make a phone call away from your phone
>>or office?
>It's not quite that far off. Already, any packages of over 1 pound now
>have to be physically brought to the postal service office, which often
>checks for id.... 

     I'm not all that jazzed about that little idea either (or the even dumber
idea of taking the priority mail stamps out of the stamp machines--what next,
a law against buying stamps for someone else?).  But unless you can come up
with a reliable way to kill someone by calling them on the telephone, the
cases are not very comparable.
--
\o\    If you're interested in books/stories with transformation themes,   \o\
/o/  try <URL:http://www.halcyon.com/phaedrus/translist/translist.html>.   /o/
\o\New entries for this list always appreciated.  FC1.21:FC(w/c)p6arw A- C-\o\
/o/D H+ M>+ P R T++++ W** Z+ Sm RLCT a cmn++++$ d e++ f+++ h- i++wf p-- sm#/o/