Article View: comp.dcom.telecom.tech
Article #48Re: Please critique: When is a B channel only 56K?
From: Al Varney
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1996 04:17
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1996 04:17
29 lines
2286 bytes
2286 bytes
In article <Jim_Sackman.18.001026A1@usa.racal.com>, Jim Sackman <Jim_Sackman@usa.racal.com> wrote: >In article <NEWTNews.820626346.32539.jrhodes@jrhodespc.nwest.mccaw.com> jrhodes@jrhodespc.nwest.mccaw.com writes: >Well, one reason for 56K B channels beyond what Fred said (which are >technically correct) is that PACBELL uses its Switched 56 network to run ISDN >data calls. An excessive all 0's is not a condition to start a Yellow alarm, >unless it causes a Red condition. LOS (Loss of Signal) would occur first. But if the question is "when do ISDN VOICE calls not get 64K unmodified?" then PacBell's Switched-56 network wouldn't enter into the answer. As far as I know, they are keeping VOICE and DATA traffic segregated by trunk group. If they eliminate any remaining non-SS7 Switched-56 trunks, then they could merge voice and 56K over the same trunks. Eventually, with B8ZS and/or DS3/SONET switch interfaces, they could also support 64K data over those same trunks (as some TELCOs already do). >Also, even though the 8th bit is used for signalling out of every 6th frame, >you should not count on the other 5. Depending on how your network is >provisioned, the carrier may have to terminate the T-1 (like at a 1/0 DACS). >This can cause "Signalling re-insertion". This is used when a T-1 superframe >is torn apart to re-align the signalling bits in the superframe. The signaling bits are also re-arranged every time the call goes through a tandem switch. Some ITU-T document (G.714?) actually indicates the probability of 1, 2, ... 6 bits of every 6 being forced to 1 by tandems on an International call, and the resulting degradation in S/N ratio. Al Varney
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4dckh0$dio@ssbunews.ih.att.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ssbunews.ih.att.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<30DDC4F0.1364@fast.net> <4c1q90$n37@mercury.near.net> <NEWTNews.820626346.32539.jrhodes@jrhodespc.nwest.mccaw.com> <Jim_Sackman.18.001026A1@usa.racal.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ssbunews.ih.att.com!not-for-mail From: varney@ihgp4.ih.att.com (Al Varney) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom.tech,comp.dcom.isdn Subject: Re: Please critique: When is a B channel only 56K? Date: 15 Jan 1996 04:17:36 GMT Organization: AT&T Sender: Al Varney <varney@ihgp.ih.att.com> Distribution: na Message-ID: <4dckh0$dio@ssbunews.ih.att.com> References: <30DDC4F0.1364@fast.net> <4c1q90$n37@mercury.near.net> <NEWTNews.820626346.32539.jrhodes@jrhodespc.nwest.mccaw.com> <Jim_Sackman.18.001026A1@usa.racal.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ihgp4.ih.att.com