🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.dcom.telecom.tech
Article #48

Re: Please critique: When is a B channel only 56K?

#48
From: Al Varney
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1996 04:17
29 lines
2286 bytes
In article <Jim_Sackman.18.001026A1@usa.racal.com>,
Jim Sackman <Jim_Sackman@usa.racal.com> wrote:
>In article <NEWTNews.820626346.32539.jrhodes@jrhodespc.nwest.mccaw.com> jrhodes@jrhodespc.nwest.mccaw.com writes:
>Well, one reason for 56K B channels beyond what Fred said (which are 
>technically correct) is that PACBELL uses its Switched 56 network to run ISDN 
>data calls.  An excessive all 0's is not a condition to start a Yellow alarm, 
>unless it causes a Red condition.  LOS (Loss of Signal) would occur first.

   But if the question is "when do ISDN VOICE calls not get 64K unmodified?"
then PacBell's Switched-56 network wouldn't enter into the answer.  As far as
I know, they are keeping VOICE and DATA traffic segregated by trunk group.
If they eliminate any remaining non-SS7 Switched-56 trunks, then they could
merge voice and 56K over the same trunks.  Eventually, with B8ZS and/or
DS3/SONET switch interfaces, they could also support 64K data over those
same trunks (as some TELCOs already do).

>Also, even though the 8th bit is used for signalling out of every 6th frame, 
>you should not count on the other 5.  Depending on how your network is 
>provisioned, the carrier may have to terminate the T-1 (like at a 1/0 DACS).  
>This can cause "Signalling re-insertion".  This is used when a T-1 superframe 
>is torn apart to re-align the signalling bits in the superframe.

   The signaling bits are also re-arranged every time the call goes through
a tandem switch.  Some ITU-T document (G.714?) actually indicates the
probability of 1, 2, ... 6 bits of every 6 being forced to 1 by tandems on
an International call, and the resulting degradation in S/N ratio.

Al Varney
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4dckh0$dio@ssbunews.ih.att.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ssbunews.ih.att.com!not-for-mail
References: <30DDC4F0.1364@fast.net> <4c1q90$n37@mercury.near.net> <NEWTNews.820626346.32539.jrhodes@jrhodespc.nwest.mccaw.com> <Jim_Sackman.18.001026A1@usa.racal.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ssbunews.ih.att.com!not-for-mail
From: varney@ihgp4.ih.att.com (Al Varney)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom.tech,comp.dcom.isdn
Subject: Re: Please critique: When is a B channel only 56K?
Date: 15 Jan 1996 04:17:36 GMT
Organization: AT&T
Sender: Al Varney <varney@ihgp.ih.att.com>
Distribution: na
Message-ID: <4dckh0$dio@ssbunews.ih.att.com>
References: <30DDC4F0.1364@fast.net> <4c1q90$n37@mercury.near.net> <NEWTNews.820626346.32539.jrhodes@jrhodespc.nwest.mccaw.com> <Jim_Sackman.18.001026A1@usa.racal.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ihgp4.ih.att.com