Thread View: comp.doc.techreports
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Laurence Leff
Sat, 19 Aug 1989 20:13
tr-input/uklirb
Author: Laurence Leff
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 1989 20:13
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 1989 20:13
324 lines
17455 bytes
17455 bytes
============================================================================
Project 'High Performance Transaction Systems'
Data Management Systems Institute (Prof. Haerder)
Dept. of Computer Science
Univ. of Kaiserslautern, West Germany
Technical Reports (1985 - 1989)
If you wish to request a copy of one of the following reports,
please contact:
Dr. Erhard Rahm
Dept. of Computer Science
Univ. Kaiserslautern
P.O. Box 3049
D-6750 Kaiserslautern, West Germany
E-mail: rahm@uklirb.uucp
============================================================================
A. Reuter:
Load Control and Load Balancing in a Shared Database Management System,
TR 129/85, March 1985
In shared DBMS, there is a need for dynamically setting a large number
of operational parameters, like transaction routing tables, assignment
of central resources, multiprogramming level etc. It is shown that
static techniques as they are applied in current centralized DBMS are
inadequate for exploiting the performance potential of a shared DBMS.
We therefore plead for using dynamic load control methods for adaptive
modification of the DBMS's operational parameters. After a brief survey
of the state of the art in database load control, we outline an approach
for load balancing in a shared system, which consists of both analytic
models and heuristics. The key concepts are illustrated by a simple
example, and a number of areas for future research are identified.
This paper appeared in 2nd Int. Conf. on Data Engineering, pp. 188-197, 1986
============================================================================
E. Rahm:
Primary Copy Synchronization for DB-Sharing, TR 137/85, July 1985
In a database sharing (DB-Sharing) system, multiple loosely or
closely coupled processors share access to a single set of
databases. Such systems promise better availability and linear
growth of transaction throughput at equivalent response time
compared to single processor database systems. The efficiency of a
DB-Sharing system heavily depends on the synchronization technique
used for maintaining consistency of the shared data. A promising
algorithm is the primary copy approach which will be presented in
this paper. We describe the actions of the lock manager in a basic
and in a more advanced version. Furthermore, it is shown how the
lock managers can be enabled to deal with the so-called buffer
invalidation problem that results from the existence of a database
buffer in each processor.
An improved version of this report appeared in INFORMATION SYSTEMS,
Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 275-286, 1986
=========================================================================
E. Rahm:
A Reliable and Efficient Synchronization Protocol for Database Sharing
Systems, TR 139/85, Aug. 1985
We describe how the primary copy protocol for DB-sharing can be extended
to continue concurrency control after processor crashes.
In particular, mechanisms are proposed to reconstruct lost lock
tables and to adapt the PCA allocation. The redundancy required for
reconstruction of lost lock information can be provided with nearly
no extra costs during normal processing. We outline additional recovery
actions which can partly be processed in parallel to permit a fast
crash recovery.
This paper appeared in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Fault-Tolerant
Computing Systems, pp. 336-347, 1987 (Springer-Verlag)
============================================================================
E. Rahm:
Buffer Invalidation Problem in DB-Sharing System, TR 154/86, Feb. 1986
In the near future large transaction processing systems will have to meet
high requirements concerning throughput, response times, availability and
modular growth. A possible architecture for such high performance systems is
DB-Sharing where multiple loosely or closely coupled processors share the
common database at the disk level. Unfortunately, DB-Sharing has a buffer
invalidation problem since each processor maintains a database buffer of its
own and, therefore, multiple copies of a database page may reside in multiple
buffers. Modification of any copy will thus invalidate all other copies.
This paper provides a spectrum of solutions to this buffer invalidation
problem. It turns out that the most effective solutions are feasible if
synchronization and buffer control can be combined. Further sections deal
with the implications of a processor crash and the use of a global database
buffer in the context of buffer invalidation.
A subset of this report appeared as 'Integrated Solutions to Concurrency
Control and Buffer Invalidation' in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Computers
and Applications, pp. 410-417, 1987
=========================================================================
E. Rahm:
Concurrency Control in DB-Sharing Systems, 1986
This paper gives an overview of concurrency control algorithms for
data sharing (DB-Sharing). We distinguish between locking and optimistic
methods and between centralized and distributed solutions.
Five synchronization protocols are described in some detail and
compared with each other.
This paper appeared in Proc. 16th Annual Conf. of the German Computer
Society GI, pp. 617-632, 1986 (Springer-Verlag)
=============================================================================
T. Haerder:
Handling Hot Spot Data in DB-Sharing Systems, IBM Research Report
RJ 5523, 1987
We review various solutions for concurrency control on aggregate data
where the operations to be synchronized commute - at least for certain
value ranges. In particular, the escrow mechanism for centralized DBMS
is discussed and extended. Our investigations focus on the escrow
mechanism for a data sharing environment. We propose the use of global
escrow services which may be called asynchronously. Such an optimistic
attitude seems to be apprpriate, since rejections of escrow
operations typically are rare events. The performance of the proposed
scheme may be further improved by refining it to a hierarchical escrow
scheme with a global escrow and distributed local escrows.
This paper appeared in Information Systems, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 155-166, 1988
=============================================================================
E. Rahm:
Performance Evaluation of Primary Copy Synchronization in
Database Sharing Systems, TR 165/87, Feb. 1987
In this paper we investigate the performance of the
primary copy protocol which has been proposed for concurrency
and coherency control in data sharing systems. A trace-driven
simulation system has been developed where the synchronization
component together with buffer management and logging components
have been completely implemented. Detailed simulation results
are presented for two transaction loads and a varying number of
processors. In addition, the performance impact of different
communication costs and load distribution strategies (affinity
based vs. random routing) is investigated.
========================================================================
E. Rahm:
Design of Optimistic Methods for Concurrency Control in Database Sharing
Systems, 1987
Optimistic methods promise less synchronization messages per transaction
than locking algorithms for concurrency control in database sharing (DB-
sharing) systems. We describe a new distributed protocol called broadcast
validation where the validations for a transaction are simultaneously
started at multiple processors by a broadcast message. Such a parallel
validation scheme is prerequisite for reaching short response times and
high transaction rates. The use of timestamps permits simple and fast
validations as well as an integrated solution to the so-called buffer
invalidation problem that is introduced by the DB-sharing architecture.
Further improvements of our algorithm are proposed in order to reduce the
synchronization overhead and to allow a combination with a distributed
locking protocol which is advisable for applications with higher conflict
probability. The communication and validation overhead of our algorithms is
quantified by simple estimates.
This report appeared in Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Distributed Computing
Systems, pp. 154-161, 1987
=============================================================================
T. Haerder:
On Selected Performance Issues of Database Systems, 1987
Performance, data integrity, and user-friendly access to data are
considered the cardinal properties of DBMS. But performance will
steadily receive more attention as more interactive applications are
designed and implemented for almost all domains of our life.
We discuss specific performance problems of 'conventional' DBMS,
DB/DC systems, and DBMS for 'non-standard' applications (e.g.
engineering, office, etc.). Then, a short survey attempts to sketch
the solutions achieved and the problems remaining for the most
performance-critical DBMS functions/components.
This paper appeared in Proc. 4th Conf. on Measurement, Modelling and
Evaluation of Computer Systems, pp. 294-312, 1987 (Springer-Verlag)
=============================================================================
E. Rahm:
Design and Evaluation of Concurrency and Coherency Control Techniques
for Database Sharing Systems, TR 182/88, May 1988
This paper provides a survey and an empirical performance evaluation of
concurrency and coherency control protocols for DB-sharing.
For synchronization a number of locking and optimistic protocols are discussed
as well as some design alternatives like multiversion concurrency control or
schemes for reduced consistency requirements. Strategies for coherency
control are classified and their integration into the synchronization
protocols is described. For a realistic performance comparison of the
presented protocols a trace-driven simulation system for loosely coupled
DB-Sharing systems has been developed. Within this system six concurrency
and coherency control protocols together with buffer management and
logging components have been completely implemented; a table-driven
approach is pursued for distributing the transaction load among the
processors. In addition to the quantitative comparison of the protocols,
the performance impact of different communication costs and load
distribution strategies (affinity based vs. random routing) is investigated.
A discussion of the simulation results (for 4 protocols) can also be found in
'Empirical Performance Evaluation of Concurrency and Coherency Control
Protocols for Data Sharing', IBM Research Report RC 14325, 1988
===========================================================================
E. Rahm, A. Thomasian:
Distributed Optimistic Concurrency Control for High Performance
Transaction Processing, IBM Research Report, Yorktown Heights, 1989
The performance of high-volume transaction processing systems is
determined by the degree of hardware and data contention. This is
especially a problem in the case of distributed systems with global
transactions accessing and updating objects from multiple systems.
While the conventional two-phase locking method of centralized
systems can be adapted for concurrency control in distributed systems,
it may restrict system throughput to very low levels.
This is due to a significant increase in lock holding times and
associated transaction waiting time for locks, as compared to
centralized systems. Optimistic concurrency control (OCC) which
is similarly extensible to distributed systems has the disadvantage of
repeated transaction restarts, which is a weak point of currently
proposed methods. We propose a new hybrid method based on OCC
followed by locking, which is an integral part of distributed
validation and two-phase commit. This advanced OCC method assures
that a transaction failing its validation will not be re-executed
more than once, in general. Furthermore deadlocks, which are difficult
to handle in a distributed environment, are avoided by serializing
lock requests. We outline implementation details and compare
the performance of the new scheme with distributed two-phase locking.
==========================================================================
V. Bohn:
Performance Evaluation of a Distributed Database System by Means of
Discrete Event Simulation, 1989
We investigate the performance behavior of locally distributed database
system which use front-end processors to allocate the workload to
transaction processing nodes. The performance analysis is based on
a complex simulation system which is driven by page reference strings
and employs discrete event handling for simulation control.
Main parameters of the simulation system include the number of
nodes and the multiprogramming level. Response time and throughput
results are analysed as well as internal statistics (communication
frequency, CPU utilization etc.)
This paper appears in Proc. 3rd European Simulation Congress, Sep. 1989
==========================================================================
E. Rahm:
A Framework for Workload Allocation in Distributed Transaction Systems,
Sept. 1989
Ever increasing demands for high transaction rates, limitations of
high-end processors, high availability and modular growth considerations
are all driving forces towards distributed architectures for transaction
processing. A key prerequisite to take advantage of the capacity of a
distributed transaction system, however, is an effective strategy for
workload allocation. The distribution of the workload should not only
achieve load balancing, but also support an efficient transaction
processing with a minimum of inter-system communication. To this end,
dynamic - yet efficient - schemes for transaction routing have to be
employed which are highly responsive to configuration changes and
workload fluctuations.
We develop a general framework for workload allocation in distributed
transaction systems. This framework is based on a classification of
distributed architectures and execution models for transaction
processing which determine the optimization potential for workload
distribution. The framework helps to identify key factors and
alternatives in the design of appropriate allocation schemes.
Furthermore, it facilitates a comparison of existing schemes and may
guide the development of new, more effective protocols.
===========================================================================
===========================================================================
The following reports are available in GERMAN:
T. Haerder, E. Rahm:
Quantitative Analysis of a Synchronization Algorithm for Data Sharing, 1985
(conference paper, simulation study of extended pass-the-buck protocol)
E. Rahm:
Closely Coupled Architectures for Data Sharing, 1986 (conference paper)
E. Rahm:
Algorithms for Efficient Load Control in Multiprocessor Database Systems, 1986
(journal paper)
T. Haerder, E. Rahm:
Multiprocessor Database Systems for High Performance Transaction Procesing, 1986
(journal paper, classification of distributed architectures for database
management)
T. Haerder, E. Rahm:
High Performance Database Systems - Comparison and Evaluation of Current
Architectural Approaches and their Implementation, 1987
(journal paper, comparison of 'shared disk' and 'shared nothing')
K. Meyer-Wegener:
Transaction Systems - Distributed Processing and Distributed Data Management,
1987 (journal paper)
T. Haerder:
Fault Tolerance in Transaction Processing Systems, 1987 (conference paper)
E. Rahm:
Optimistic Concurrency Control in Centralized and Distributed Database Systems,
1988 (journal paper)
V. Bohn, T. Wagner:
Cooperation between Load Control and Recovery in Data Sharing Systems, 1989
E. Rahm:
The Data Sharing Approach to High Performance Transaction Processing, 1989
(journal paper, summarizes state of the art for 'shared disk' implementations)
V. Bohn:
Characteristics of Transaction Workloads in DB/DC Systems, 1989
(conference paper, workload characterization based on trace analysis)
V. Bohn, T. Wagner:
Transaction Chains - Concept and Implementation, 1989
(conference paper, implementation of 'sagas')
T. Haerder, K. Meyer-Wegener:
Transaction Processing in Workstation/Server Environments, 1989
T. Haerder, E. Rahm:
Utilization of New Storage Architectures for High Performance Transaction
Processing, 1989
(use of shared semiconductor stores in data sharing systems)
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads