Article View: comp.dsp
Article #1009Processor choice & Thanks
From: Marcus Barnaby Bointon
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 1990 11:36
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 1990 11:36
21 lines
1562 bytes
1562 bytes
Thanks to all those that replied to my plea! I am faced with the question of which processor to use for my final year DSP board. I seem to have narrowed the choice to TMS320x0 or MC56000 series. Which are better/easier to use etc? I will be using it for audio with the required converters, and would want to use it for housekeeping on the board too (i.e. rs232) so I need a reasonable address space (>64k). I only have docs for the TMS's so far- what can anyone tell me about the 56k series? (just an outline!) Are there any other alternatives? Would I benefit in using the 56k as I have a 68k background? Thanks again... <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<=Marcus Bointon=>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Consultant, Campaign for the Reduction of Entropy (C.R.E. Group(U.K.)) >> << Campaign HQ: JANET%ZDAC810@UK.AC.KCL.CC.OAK or bointon@kcl.cs.UUCP >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Disclaimer: This message has been treated with flame-resistant chemicals >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1611@xenon.kcl-cs.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!yale!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!ukc!strath-cs!cs.glasgow.ac.uk!kcl-cs!bointonShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!yale!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!ukc!strath-cs!cs.glasgow.ac.uk!kcl-cs!bointon From: bointon@kcl-cs.UUCP (Marcus Barnaby Bointon) Newsgroups: comp.dsp Subject: Processor choice & Thanks Message-ID: <1611@xenon.kcl-cs.UUCP> Date: 17 Oct 90 11:36:12 GMT Reply-To: bointon@kcl-cs.UUCP (Marcus Barnaby Bointon) Organization: Dept. of Computing, Kings College London Lines: 21