Article View: comp.dsp
Article #1037Re: comp.speech - why not?
From: Tony Robinson
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 1990 15:32
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 1990 15:32
22 lines
1538 bytes
1538 bytes
In article <29320@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> jbuck@galileo.berkeley.edu (Joe Buck) writes regarding a the proposal for a newsgroup to discuss speech issues: >comp.dsp is currently small enough that there is plenty of room for people's >postings about speech analysis and synthesis, speech recognition, speaker >recognition, the theory of speech production and reception by human beings, >etc. Yes, but whereas your first two subjects, "speech analysis and synthesis" may or may not use DSP techniques, the remainder, "speech recognition, speaker recognition, the theory of speech production and reception by human beings" are not really DSP topics at all. So comp.speech would cover much more than the speech issues you see in comp.dsp. There is discussion in comp.ai.neural-nets about speech recognition and databases, talk in rec.music.synth about basic waveform techniques and lots of talk in misc.handicapped on the application of speech synthesis. Speech also entends into spoken language, and that is discussed in sci.lang. Tony Robinson
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<16420@rasp.eng.cam.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!wuarchive!uunet!mcsun!ukc!cam-eng!ajrReferences:
<9377.27299857@ul.ie> <29320@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!wuarchive!uunet!mcsun!ukc!cam-eng!ajr From: ajr@eng.cam.ac.uk (Tony Robinson) Newsgroups: comp.dsp Subject: Re: comp.speech - why not? Keywords: I'll tell you why Message-ID: <16420@rasp.eng.cam.ac.uk> Date: 1 Nov 90 15:32:56 GMT References: <9377.27299857@ul.ie> <29320@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> Sender: ajr@eng.cam.ac.uk Organization: Cambridge University Engineering Department, UK Lines: 22