Article View: comp.dsp
Article #1054Re: Processor choice & Thanks
From: Rich Goldschmidt
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 1990 13:30
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 1990 13:30
18 lines
1306 bytes
1306 bytes
> Your large address space requirement rules out the MC56000 series unless > you use paging techniques (yech!). The 56000 only has a 64K word address > space. I believe that you will have to go to the 96000 or the TMS320C30 > generation to go beyond 64K words of program space. > Mark Stambaugh > stambaug@hpspkla.hp.com I have been considering using the 96000 as a fast floating point coprocessor for some general purpose computing which is floating point intensive. Does this make sense, and does the compiler support the needs of general purpose computing with standard libraries, including I/O (like printf and file access) and math functions? Any suggestions on sources for coprocessor boards and alternatives to the 96000 for general floating point? Thanks. -- Rich Goldschmidt: uunet!fjcp60!golds or golds@fjc.gov Commercialization of space is the best way to escape the zero-sum game.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<348@fjcp60.GOV>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!fjcp60!goldsReferences:
<1611@xenon.kcl-cs.UUCP> <2590003@hpspkla.spk.hp.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!fjcp60!golds From: golds@fjc.GOV (Rich Goldschmidt) Newsgroups: comp.dsp Subject: Re: Processor choice & Thanks Message-ID: <348@fjcp60.GOV> Date: 30 Oct 90 13:30:28 GMT References: <1611@xenon.kcl-cs.UUCP> <2590003@hpspkla.spk.hp.com> Organization: Federal Judicial Center, Washington, D.C. Lines: 18