Comparing C30 Development Systems

Article View: comp.dsp

Article #1296

#1296

From: Scott Chilcote
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1992 13:47

23 lines
1283 bytes

Hi Folx...

My company has been using the PC Compatible C30 development system from Texas
Instruments to code the C30 in C and assembly.  We find it acceptable for most
purposes, with the possible exception of the ability to determine precise
performance time for algorithms.

We recently found out about the National Instruments development system for 
NuBUS, and are seriously considering it since we have some Mac IIcis, and the
new system costs a few thousand dollars less than the TI setup.

Is anyone familiar with the National Instruments system?  Any feedback on what
works well and what doesn't?  Our experience is that it takes some time to
determine where the pitfalls and holdups are when using one of these products,
and I'd greatly appreciate hearing from anyone who has put some mileage on one
and is willing to share the wisdom!

----------------------------------------------------------
Scott R. Chilcote
Digital System Resources
scottc!dsr.uunet.uu.net
#include <standard_disclaimers.h>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Oct01.134736.11023@dsr.uucp>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dsr!scottc

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.dsp
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dsr!scottc
From: scottc@dsr.uucp (Scott Chilcote)
Subject: Comparing C30 Development Systems
Organization: DSR
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1992 13:47:36 GMT
Message-ID: <1992Oct01.134736.11023@dsr.uucp>
Lines: 24