Article View: comp.dsp
Article #1901Re: Motorola's gcc diffs?
From: Stephen L Moshier
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 16:03
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 16:03
6 lines
750 bytes
750 bytes
The one I tried is called Version 1.03. When you try to compile something with it, it bombs when it gets to the point of looking for the non-existent optimizer. The illegal instruction sequences include using an address register on the instruction after loading it, and doing a subroutine return on the instruction after modifying the system stack (i.e. popping the status).
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BzvJAM.H8C@world.std.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!world!moshierReferences:
<Bzs3CD.26o@world.std.com> <1992Dec25.181709.19960@qcj.icon.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.dsp Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!world!moshier From: moshier@world.std.com (Stephen L Moshier) Subject: Re: Motorola's gcc diffs? Message-ID: <BzvJAM.H8C@world.std.com> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA References: <Bzs3CD.26o@world.std.com> <1992Dec25.181709.19960@qcj.icon.com> Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 16:03:58 GMT Lines: 7