🚀 go-pugleaf

GX > Each PC has a dial-up controller-based
GX > [i.e. purely-hardware] modem.

G > Who the hell wants the low speed of dial up internet?

GX > The PCs in this cafe are like text terminals.
GX > Where is the need for anything faster
GX > than MPSK-based dial up?

Invest your life savings then!

> > GX > with an additional zing of anonymity
> > GX > to write whatever you want in chat rooms.
> > GX > What more could any warm-hearted,
> > GX > compassionate, fair, vulnerable outcast
> > GX > -- like me and many other geeks -- ask for?

G > Your business model would be based
G > on sociopaths and psychopaths?

> No, it would be based on warm-hearted, compassionate, nerdy
> individuals [like me] who want to punish society for its deplorable
> acts against psychiatric patients -- such a me.

Exactly, sociopaths and psychopaths.


> > > You're right. I won't change society and I don't plan to. I just want
> > > to psychologically-scar my enemies to their very cores. I would like
> > > to do this by writing extremely explicit text in chat rooms. The stuff
> > > I'd like to write is so lewd, perverse, deviant, taboo, and
> > > unacceptable by the norms of society, that it will elicit an
> > > emotionally-charged and violent reaction from readers.

G > Yet you claim it would be completely legal.

GX > By current legislation it is. I can write pretty much whatever I
GX > please so long as I'm not making any criminal-threats.

You honestly think nobody's tracking you?

Go into the anonymous remailer newsgroup and
search for the court records on Carl Johnson.
The "anonymous remailer community" actually
maintained those records online for years hoping
to use the records to prevent their own arrests.

Check out his story!

LOL

> > > Please note that I gain *no* pleasure, humor, or happiness from doing
> > > the above. I would, however, obtain a temporary but significant
> > > decrease in my frustration and anger against society.
>
> > > If I continually punish society via my textual attacks, I'm curious as
> > > to what will happen.
>
> > > My guess is that the media will get involved and there will be mass
> > > societal outrage. The streets will be filled with furious puritanical
> > > buttholes who will violently protest, throw rocks, pelt stones, and
> > > start fires. How cool!
>
> > > People in the chat rooms will go crazy. They'll start marching on the
> > > streets and violently protesting. They will demand that the government
> > > make new laws. New laws rendering the socially-unacceptable stuff I
> > > write illegal. These people will form lynch mobs forcing the enactment
> > > of new legislations and draconian penalties against the stuff I'd like
> > > to write in chat rooms [which currently don't violate any law].
>
> > > Am I right?
>
> > > Currently that stuff I'd like to write in chat rooms is totally-legal.
> > > However, laws can change and that is not good for me.
> > So apparently you would want to close down freedom
> > of speech, even though you apparently want free speech.
>
> > And you've realized that what you propose is self-defeating for you.

G > So WHY do something that bites YOU in the ass?

> So long as I'm anonymous enough, it doesn't matter if society
> eliminates freedom of speech.
>
> With the level of anonymity this hypothetical cafe provides, the cost
> of tracking me down would be astronomical. Sure it's possible, but any
> rational figure of authority would save their time, energy, and money
> taking a bite out of crimes that really matter.
>
> > > Using this hypothetical chat cafe, I can write dirty filthy sick
> > > things in chat rooms that would otherwise get me into a LOT of trouble
> > > with society and its evil puritans.
> > Yet you said it's all perfectly legal.
> > Doubtful.
>
> Right now, it is perfectly-legal but I'd like to prepare for when new
> legislation is passed -- possibly rendering my speeches illegal.


I see you snipped the following away.
Restored at no charge.

GX > On one of my computer's I'm currently
GX > using Tor and Vidalia -- which I
GX > just downloaded and installed.

Oh good, I'm so glad you didn't notice who
actually runs some of the servers they use,
or the funny things somebody slipped into
the code that refuses to let you avoid
certain servers.

The "anonymous remailer community"
has had a noticeable slowdown after the
Adrian Lamo/Manning/Assange thing.

As if the half of anonymous remailer users
weren't bonafide pedophiles to begin with,
now there a military/intelligence reason to
watch anonymous remailers very carefully.