Article View: comp.dsp
Article #2395eigenanalysis-based frequency estimation
From: Jim Kohli
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 1989 22:47
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 1989 22:47
24 lines
1236 bytes
1236 bytes
I've been attempting to use the routines in Marple's "Digital Spectral Analysis with applications" (a VERY fine book), but I'm having some problem coming up with a "rule of thumb" for automagically assigning a value for IP, the "dimension of data matrix" parameter, in the EIGENFREQ routine. This parameter represents the rank of the sample autocorrelation matrix. Can someone tell me what the rationale is for not making this parameter the same dimension as the data being operated on? (other than reducing the amount of computations-- and if that is why, some criteria for determination of a good rule of thumb???). In Marple's example on 64 points of test data, the signal space dimension is set to be 11, but IP is 15 (as opposed to 64). thanks (as usual!), Jim Kohli GE Medical Systems Waukesha WI, USA
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1769@mrsvr.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!mrsvr.UUCP!kohli@gemed.ge.comShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!mrsvr.UUCP!kohli@gemed.ge.com From: kohli@gemed (Jim Kohli) Newsgroups: comp.dsp Subject: eigenanalysis-based frequency estimation Message-ID: <1769@mrsvr.UUCP> Date: 27 Dec 89 22:47:40 GMT Sender: news@mrsvr.UUCP Reply-To: kohli@gemed.ge.com (Jim Kohli) Organization: Geo-Duckside Exploration Unit # 1 Lines: 24