🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.dsp
Article #2429

Content Request

#2429
From: C. D. Covington
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1990 20:28
56 lines
2874 bytes
1. Comparisons of DSP peripherals.
    a. Atlanta Signal Processors.
    b. Ariel.
    c. Manufacturers Evaluation Boards/Development Kits.
          TI, Motorola, INMOS, NEC, etc.
    d. Myriads of others I am woefully negligent in not naming...

    comments on cost, speed, number of processors, acceptable host systems,
    required graphics, problem domains, A/D D/A configurations, ....

2. Discussion of application of DSP to acoustic environments.
    a. The old auditorium feedback problem.  (I have made some measurements
       on this one myself.)
    b. Applications of adaptive filtering for active noise cancelation:
       issues include coefficient precision, stability, achievable suppression,
       types of noise, etc.

3. Graphical Programming
   [I developed a graphical programming language called GOSPL as funded by
    TI to run on an Explorer with an Odyssey board, i.e. 4 TMS32020's.  This
    concept has been substantially extended in systems like the block diagram
    compiler (BDC) of Lincoln Labs and the Gabriel system recently described.
    This area really seems to be hot right now.]
     a.  Efficiency of code.
     b.  Speed of Development.
     c.  Scope of problem domains available.
     d.  Prototyping/Testing tools.
     e.  Hardware/Software platform requirements.

4. Speech Processing Hardware
     a. Sources and comparison of speech synthesizers
        1. Text-to-Speech.
        2. Speech Response Units.
     b. Sources and comparison of speech recognizers
        1. Speaker dep./indep.
        2. Training required.
        3. Acoustical sensitivities (microphone placement, noise, etc.)
        4. Vocabulary size.
        5. Cost, Hardware, Performance, etc.
     c. Sources and comparison of speech coding systems
        1. VS&F market.
        2. Voice Mail coding algorithms.
             (ref. articles by Jayant et al)
        3. Real-time vs non-real time applications.

5. Sources of information about the DSP marketplace.
     a. ICASSP
     b. Speech Tech
     c. Telecommunications conferences
     d. Image processing conferences


C. David Covington        WA5TGF               INTERNET cdc@uafhcx.uark.edu
Assistant Professor, Electrical Engineering  (501)575-6583 campus office
University of Arkansas                            575-5379 research office
Fayetteville, AR 72701                            575-3041 research lab
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3645@uafhp.uark.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ceres!iowasp!deimos!uafhp!uafhcx!cdc

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ceres!iowasp!deimos!uafhp!uafhcx!cdc
From: cdc@uafhcx.uucp (C. D. Covington)
Newsgroups: comp.dsp
Subject: Content Request
Summary: What I would like to see in comp.dsp
Message-ID: <3645@uafhp.uark.edu>
Date: 6 Feb 90 20:28:40 GMT
Sender: netnews@uafhp.uark.edu
Organization: College of Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
Lines: 56