Article View: comp.dsp
Article #2475Re: Can this be accomplished?
From: GreenXenon
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 04:11
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 04:11
40 lines
2844 bytes
2844 bytes
On May 10, 7:13 pm, Jerry Avins <j...@ieee.org> wrote: > GreenXenon wrote: > > On May 10, 5:53 pm, Jerry Avins <j...@ieee.org> wrote: > > >> GreenXenon wrote: > > >>> Hi: > >>> Does a device that switches frequency [in number of Hz] with peak-to- > >>> peak amplitude [in number of in electron(s)-per-second-per-square- > >>> meter] – and visa versa -- exist? If not, is it possible to construct > >>> one? > >>> In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and > >>> a peak-to-peak amplitude of Y electron[s]-per-second-per-square-meter > >>> will result in the output of a signal that has a frequency of Y Hz and > >>> a peak-to-peak amplitude of X electron[s]-per-second-per-square-meter. > > >> The question is based on a completely erroneous assumption. Electrons > >> per second per square meter is a current density, if an electron's > >> charge is accounted for. In electronics, it is usually current, not > >> current density, that matters. > > > So the amplitude is determined by the amperage? > > No. With real signals, amplitude is often taken to be voltage, although > power is sometimes used (think decibels). So in the device I'm thinking of [which I posted in the start of the thread] the amplitude would be determined by volts? Or would it be in watts-per-square-meter? Or just watts?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<cf1d8732-2146-46ca-a328-4a16e21bca3c@v35g2000pro.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!v35g2000pro.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<43e821fe-784d-4ed3-8e86-bb1afcdec36f@r31g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <9GKNl.62715$WT7.23251@newsfe11.iad> <cc70c2c7-aa85-4aee-b274-39cc69543244@w31g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <WQLNl.40547$BX.40501@newsfe18.iad>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 4f2adb460c,112a3fefc16912ed X-Google-Attributes: gid4f2adb460c,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!v35g2000pro.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: GreenXenon <glucegen1x@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.dsp,aus.electronics,alt.engineering.electrical,alt.sci.physics Subject: Re: Can this be accomplished? Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 21:11:30 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 40 Message-ID: <cf1d8732-2146-46ca-a328-4a16e21bca3c@v35g2000pro.googlegroups.com> References: <43e821fe-784d-4ed3-8e86-bb1afcdec36f@r31g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <9GKNl.62715$WT7.23251@newsfe11.iad> <cc70c2c7-aa85-4aee-b274-39cc69543244@w31g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <WQLNl.40547$BX.40501@newsfe18.iad> NNTP-Posting-Host: 98.154.25.80 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1242015090 30646 127.0.0.1 (11 May 2009 04:11:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 04:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: v35g2000pro.googlegroups.com; posting-host=98.154.25.80; posting-account=Wy8VrAoAAADVUrKVaKLiw11eVJGWeIpU User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090403 SeaMonkey/1.1.16,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)