Article View: comp.dsp
Article #37Re: Stereo separation of a mono signal
From: Pawel Jalocha
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1992 11:48
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1992 11:48
51 lines
2891 bytes
2891 bytes
In article <3938@randvax.rand.org>, edhall@rand.org (Ed Hall) writes... >In article <1992Oct29.092702.973@dxcern.cern.ch> jalocha@dxcern.cern.ch (Pawel Jalocha) writes: >>I'm a beginner in DSP but if I were you I would just delay one signal >>in respect to the other. No filtering, no amplitude change. >>This is how human ears work - if the right ear hears a signal >>advanced in respect too the left ear the brain assumes the signal >>is coming from the right. > >This is /one/ of the cues human ears use. Amplitude difference is >another, and tends to predominate in stereo reproduction. Good thing, >since controlling the position of your head relative to your loudspeakers >with centimeter accuracy is a bit difficult! But one of the reasons that >binaural recordings played through headphones sound so realistic is the >faithful reproduction of the interaural delays. > > -Ed Hall > edhall@rand.org From my (non-expert) experience I would say the inter-aural delay is dominant. If you listen with earphones to a mono broadcast and you move the "balance" potentiometer then the sound "position" does move but not much really. But record same sound on a tape, and while playing back on a stereo player turn the magnetic head _just_ a bit (don't do it on a new player :-) and you hear the source moves immediately right or left. You may check after that the volumes in both ears are same but the sound is not in front of you. This is because after you have turned the stereo head it reads one tape track a bit delayed from the other. About your head and the loudspeakers: When you move your head just a centimeter the sound source _does_ move. You don't notice it because you brain "knows" you moved your head and it "subtracts" this movement and does not inform you about the apparent movement of the source. I agree that apart from inter-aural delay there is the amplitude effect involved but trying to reproduce stereo effect with _only_ amplitudes does not work for me. I really dislike stereo recordings made with "amplitude modify" techniques. I recognize such technique is simple as it only involves potentiometers but it's a shame today when you can have analog delay lines (not to mention DSPs). Remember I'm an amateur and my brain + ears may be different from an average one :-) Pawel
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<30OCT199212482391@vxcrna.cern.ch>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!dxcern!vxcrna.cern.ch!jalochaReferences:
<dfrankow.720161824@myria> <1992Oct29.092702.973@dxcern.cern.ch> <3938@randvax.rand.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.dsp Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!dxcern!vxcrna.cern.ch!jalocha From: jalocha@vxcrna.cern.ch (Pawel Jalocha) Subject: Re: Stereo separation of a mono signal Message-ID: <30OCT199212482391@vxcrna.cern.ch> News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41 Sender: news@dxcern.cern.ch (USENET News System) Organization: European Organization for Nuclear Research, CERN References: <dfrankow.720161824@myria> <1992Oct29.092702.973@dxcern.cern.ch> <3938@randvax.rand.org> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1992 11:48:00 GMT Lines: 51