Re: DSP textbook

Article View: comp.dsp

Article #397

#397

From: daniel mocsny
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1989 15:41

15 lines
1136 bytes

In article <1989Sep24.032613.11841@utzoo.uucp>, henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) writes:
> I think it's going to come down to a war between TeX and eqn.  Each is more
> common in some environments.  Expressive power is similar;

Then why force users to choose one over the other? Why not develop public-
domain translators between them? Then everyone could have the translator,
and all sites could then select the system that maximizes their perceived
benefit, while remaining certain that their output will have the widest
possible distribution.

The idea that *my* computer can't let me see *your* work is, IMHO,
rather silly.

Dan Mocsny
dmocsny@uceng.uc.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2225@uceng.UC.EDU>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!uccba!uceng!dmocsny

References: <PSHEN.89Sep22020601@atrp.mit.edu> <1989Sep24.032613.11841@utzoo.uucp>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!uccba!uceng!dmocsny
From: dmocsny@uceng.UC.EDU (daniel mocsny)
Newsgroups: comp.dsp
Subject: Re: DSP textbook
Summary: Why not either?
Message-ID: <2225@uceng.UC.EDU>
Date: 25 Sep 89 15:41:10 GMT
References: <PSHEN.89Sep22020601@atrp.mit.edu> <1989Sep24.032613.11841@utzoo.uucp>
Organization: Univ. of Cincinnati, College of Engg.
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message