Re: Linpack benchmark numbers for dsp chips

Article View: comp.dsp

Article #689

#689

From: Jeff Enderwick
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 10:04

10 lines
871 bytes

> subject header says it all. [...] the motorola 56K line numbers
> would be of interest as well.

Although floaing point numbers are supported by the 56k C compiler,
Linpack wouldn't be a very good benchmark for fixed point processors,
IMHO. Linpack performance is dominated by floating point performance.
Can you give us some insight?

	Jeff Enderwick
	jeff@dsp.sps.mot.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <JEFF.92Sep11100457@dsp.sps.mot.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!oakhill!oakhill!jeff

References: <Bu9rIv.Bu5@ecf.toronto.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.dsp
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!oakhill!oakhill!jeff
From: jeff@dsp.sps.mot.com (Jeff Enderwick)
Subject: Re: Linpack benchmark numbers for dsp chips
In-Reply-To: apollo@ecf.toronto.edu's message of 8 Sep 92 17:06:30 GMT
Message-ID: <JEFF.92Sep11100457@dsp.sps.mot.com>
Sender: news@oakhill.sps.mot.com
Nntp-Posting-Host: 223.10.249.92
Organization: Motorola DSP Compilers
References: <Bu9rIv.Bu5@ecf.toronto.edu>
Date: 11 Sep 92 10:04:57
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message