🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

2 total messages Started by u7811837 Wed, 12 Aug 1992 06:23
== A Little Question ==
#111
Author: u7811837
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 06:23
21 lines
1161 bytes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear reders ,

 I am looking for real functions A(x) and B(x) which satisfy both  the following constraints :

 (a) < A(x-k), A(x-l) > = delta(k,l). 
     < B(x-k), B(x-l) > = delta(k,l).
     < A(x-k), B(x-l) > = 0. 

 (b) < A"(x-k), B"(x-l) > = 0.

 where the symbol <.,.> stands for the inner product, and delta(.,.) stands
 for the kronecker delta function. k and l are integers. A" and B" are defined
 as the second derivatives of functions A and B.
 
 Any solution or advice will be appreciated. ( Please reply by email : u7811837@cc.nctu.edu.tw )
 
 Thanks in advance.
 
 YMH
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
Re: == A Little Question ==
#597
Author: David Kastrup
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 06:19
30 lines
1977 bytes
u7811837@ccsun9.cc.nctu.edu.tw () writes:

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Dear reders ,

> I am looking for real functions A(x) and B(x) which satisfy both  the following constraints :

> (a) < A(x-k), A(x-l) > = delta(k,l). 
>     < B(x-k), B(x-l) > = delta(k,l).
>     < A(x-k), B(x-l) > = 0. 

> (b) < A"(x-k), B"(x-l) > = 0.

> where the symbol <.,.> stands for the inner product, and delta(.,.) stands
> for the kronecker delta function. k and l are integers. A" and B" are defined
> as the second derivatives of functions A and B.
Assuming that this relations have to hold for integers only
(and the delta function is the integer one),
AND ignoring that you used a convolution in your definition, instead
of a correlation ( <A(k-x), A(x-l)> = 0, we can ignore this iff A is even),
apart from condition (b) this is just the Nyquist criteria. Now if
< A"(x-k), B"(x-l) > = 0, this means
< A(x-k), B(x-l), delta""(x) > = 0, which apart from the four time
differentiation is the same as Nyquist condition above. If you have any harmonic
signals (frequency multiplex), differentiating 4 times will not make any
difference, so the usual frequency multiplex signals will do.

Also, any orthogonal signals with a duration of strictly less than 1
will have an interval of zero about the critical sampling points in
their correlation functions, and will thus also qualify.
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads