Thread View: comp.dsp
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Jamie Mazer
Sun, 21 Apr 1991 00:08
Re: Request for info for DSP/PC boards
Author: Jamie Mazer
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1991 00:08
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1991 00:08
36 lines
1992 bytes
1992 bytes
>Ariel Corporation has a bunch of DSP boards for IBM, Mac, Sun, >HP, VME using 56001, 320, 96000, i860, and ATT dsp32. > >They have perhaps the best interactive debugger for the 56001 >and my experiences with the company have all been excellent. Speaking of which ... Is anyone using the Ariel DSP-56 board on a 386/486 pc running *UNIX* of any flavor? We're really interested in the ariel hardware and would like to use a 486-pc platform - but it MUST run X and Unix. The DSP-56 looks really nice, but the hardware seems to be supported only under MSDOS, and I don't have time to hack a device driver/library/debuggers etc to get the hardware running under unix. Has anyone done this already? One possibility is to use a sparcstation instead of a 486 box as the base platform, but we'd prefer to go with a pc, for a number of other reasons. Ater there other 56K (or C30,96K,32C etc :-) boards with A/D and D/A hardware comparable to the Ariel running under unix? I really like what they have, I just don't have time to start my project over again under a new operating system! Comments? Flames? /Jamie -- 1st: mazer@asterix.cns.caltech.edu /-------------------------------------\ 2nd: mazer@bek-owl.cns.caltech.edu /"Caltech: ... science steals your soul,\ 3rd: JMazer@caltech.bitnet \ don't come here unless you have to." / ugh: mazer@smaug.caltech.edu \-------------------------------------/
Re: Request for info for DSP/PC boards
Author: Robert La Ferla
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1991 06:04
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1991 06:04
31 lines
2008 bytes
2008 bytes
In article <MAZER.91Apr20170821@asterix.asterix.cns.caltech.edu> mazer@asterix.asterix.cns.caltech.edu (Jamie Mazer) writes: > Are there other 56K (or C30,96K,32C etc :-) boards with A/D and D/A > hardware comparable to the Ariel running under unix? I really like > what they have, I just don't have time to start my project over > again under a new operating system! Yes, there is a fantastic UNIX/DSP development on the NeXT. Each NeXT has a Motorola 56001 DSP, Bug-56 DSP symbolic debugger, macro cross-assembler, and simulator. Ariel makes the QuintProcessor which is a NeXTBus board with FIVE 27Mhz 56001 DSPs if you need the extra horsepower! Singular Solutions makes a Analog/Digital interface for the DSP. It features two channels of 16-bit delta-sigma conversion and 64 times oversampling. As for PC support, the NeXT has a program called SoftPC which allows you to run PC programs in a window - it's very good too I've seen Windows 3.0 running on it in color. A company called Pencom makes Co-Xist which allows you to run X11R4 w/Motif in another window. Well, this may be more than what you are looking for but then again... Singular Solutions (818) 792-9567 Ariel (201) 249-2900 NeXT (800) 848-NEXT Robert La Ferla Lotus Development Corporation Advanced Technology Group / Improv
Re: Request for info for DSP/PC boards
Author: Kent L Shephard
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 1991 13:44
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 1991 13:44
70 lines
3381 bytes
3381 bytes
In article <MAZER.91Apr20170821@asterix.asterix.cns.caltech.edu> mazer@asterix.asterix.cns.caltech.edu (Jamie Mazer) writes:
>
>>Ariel Corporation has a bunch of DSP boards for IBM, Mac, Sun,
>>HP, VME using 56001, 320, 96000, i860, and ATT dsp32.
>>
>>They have perhaps the best interactive debugger for the 56001
>>and my experiences with the company have all been excellent.
>
>Speaking of which ...
>
> One possibility is to use a sparcstation instead of a 486 box as
>the base platform, but we'd prefer to go with a pc, for a number
>of other reasons.
>
> Ater there other 56K (or C30,96K,32C etc :-) boards with A/D and D/A
>hardware comparable to the Ariel running under unix? I really like
>what they have, I just don't have time to start my project over
>again under a new operating system!
>
> Comments? Flames?
Well for the price of a i486, Unix, DSP board combination, which works out
to be $3000 for 486, $1000 for Unix, and $2500 for DSP board == $6500.
Those prices are approximate. For less than $6500 you could buy a
NeXTstation.
People no flames, just listen.
The OS supports the DSP, it is integrated in the system. You do need to
add A/D conversion but D/A is built in. It comes with the Ariel Debugger
and all the tolls yopu need for development.
For an integrated DSP development system you can't beat it, esp. if you are
in education. Since you are at Caltech, I assume you can get educational
pricing on a NeXT. For a little more tha a DSP board would cost you the
NeXT is available.
I am biased because I'm doing my project for my MSEE on a NeXT and it is
A/D and DSP related.
Yes I did buy a NeXT and one of the main reasons was the direct support
for the DSP in the OS and hardware integration.
BTW - If you reason for the SPARC as a second choice si X11 then don't
count the NeXT out. X11 is available for the NeXT it just isn't sold by
NeXT Inc.
The NeXT is also a cheaper alternative than the SPARC. It is also a
single neat little package. You also don't have to worry if the DSP
hardware will function properly with the system, it's part of the system.
>
>/Jamie
>
>
>--
>1st: mazer@asterix.cns.caltech.edu /-------------------------------------\
>2nd: mazer@bek-owl.cns.caltech.edu /"Caltech: ... science steals your soul,\
>3rd: JMazer@caltech.bitnet \ don't come here unless you have to." /
>ugh: mazer@smaug.caltech.edu \-------------------------------------/
Think about the NeXT it is a viable alternative and a good one.
KeNT
--
/* -The opinions expressed are my own, not my employers. */
/* For I can only express my own opinions. */
/* */
/* Kent L. Shephard : email - kls30@DUTS.ccc.amdahl.com */
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads