Thread View: comp.dsp
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by J. Porter Clark
Mon, 06 May 1991 02:38
SUMMARY: RELP
Author: J. Porter Clark
Date: Mon, 06 May 1991 02:38
Date: Mon, 06 May 1991 02:38
66 lines
2978 bytes
2978 bytes
(Something is eating about 50% of my posts. I *think* this one never made it out--please forgive me if you've seen it before.) I received a few responses to my "What is RELP" query. RELP stands for residually excited (or encoded, maybe) linear predictive code. The strain I've been hearing about digitizes voice at 9600 bps. I would have responded sooner but I lost one of the replies and spent some time looking for it. My need to know is this: The folks who are responsible for the space-to-ground link for Space Station Freedom are currently planning to use RELP to get two full duplex voice links at 9600 bps each per direction. I work on the SSF internal audio distribution and need to know how this affects our design. So, does anybody have any RELP code for sale or to be given away? +++++ Summary of responses +++++ The most complete discussion received to date and that I haven't managed to lose is from John Adcock at Lockheed Sanders. >From: adcock@rocket.sanders.com (john adcock) > >Yes that's what it stands for. > >Normal lpc vocoding uses only the all pole model of the >spectrum and the pitch to reconstruct the speech. That is to >say that during synthesis in a vanilla lpc vocoder the excitation >to the all pole filter is synthesized. RELP preserves the excitation >by saving the residual. That is with RELP you estimate >the pole model, then you do a zero filter with your pole model and preserve >the "residual" that you are left with. The residual is then used >to reconstruct the speech later. > >I've heard more about CELP >(Code excited linear predictive coding) which is >(as far as I know) based on the same idea but uses a >vector quantization method to code the residual instead of >actually transmitting the residual itself. Whether or not >a RELP or CELP vocoder is 9600 bps depends entirely on the >implementation. >NSA has a standard for the CELP algorithm and a 9600 baud >implementation. +++++++++++ >From: Rich Kerr <RJK@MILAN.QUALCOMM.COM> > >Try ICCASP 84,85. Presenter is PHil Wilson, Linkabit. > >Also PHD Thesis, Imperial University, London, Phil Wilson, 1982. RELP > ++++++++++ I also received a message from Tony Robinson (ajr@engineering.cambridge.ac.uk) referring me to books by Rabiner and Schafer and Jayant and Noll, but I had already gotten all I could get on the subject from those books. Thanks anyway. ++++++++++ Many thanks to all who responded. -- J. Porter Clark jpc@avdms8.msfc.nasa.gov
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads