🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Oct28.225639.29556@cmcl2.nyu.edu> snyder@acf3.nyu.edu (Kirk Snyder) writes:
>Does anyone have any info/rumours/speculation on the status of
>Brief?  I know that it was bought by Borland.  I've seen it
> .... 
>Does Borland intend to continue it as an independent product, or
>incorporate it into their compiler packages?  Might Borland

From Bill Duncan, (bduncan@ve3ied.uucp)
>Please post a summary of anything you find out here.
 
#include <std_disclaim.h>

	Do not take this as gospel, but at the borland/ibm OS/2 party
of the Programmers Development party this fall in Boston, they were
giving away copies of several of their products, and Brief was one of
them.  I was busy salivating over someone's OS/2 prize but I believe
that when the Borland representative was introducing the prizes he
said this blurb about brief, the old "This is a fine product we've
just picked up and we hope to continue in the tradition" etc, etc.
This was a month ago and my memory is poor but I got the impression
that they were going to continue to support it as a front-line product
and that they expected it would do well.  Sort of like parents showing
off their new baby 8).

	Again, don't take it as gospel.  Just a tidbit.

	greg
	gowen@forte.cs.tufts.edu, gowen@jade.tufts.edu


--
--Greg Owen
	gowen@forte.cs.tufts.edu, gowen@jade.tufts.edu
	"It's not a bug, it's a feature!"