Article View: comp.editors
Article #2527Re: Extension Languages
From: Tim Smith
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 09:23
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 09:23
16 lines
1322 bytes
1322 bytes
davis@pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu (John E. Davis) writes: >The reason I chose a stack based language is easy: The parsing stage is >simple. I did not want most of the executable devoted to the language. I've been planning on using a stack based language for my editor, too. This lets the basic editor (a C editing core, the interpreter, and a few important functions written in the stack language) be small and efficient. Eventually, the plan is to also provide a C compiler that compiles from C to the editor language, so that pepole who want to write their editor programs in C can do so. But this will be a separate program, so that people who simply want a small and efficient editor don't have to carry around the baggage of a C compiler or interpreter. --Tim Smith
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec16.092358.15791@u.washington.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!carson.u.washington.edu!tzsReferences:
<3859@iris.mincom.oz.au> <DAVIS.92Dec14120625@pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!carson.u.washington.edu!tzs From: tzs@carson.u.washington.edu (Tim Smith) Newsgroups: comp.editors Subject: Re: Extension Languages Message-ID: <1992Dec16.092358.15791@u.washington.edu> Date: 16 Dec 92 09:23:58 GMT Article-I.D.: u.1992Dec16.092358.15791 References: <3859@iris.mincom.oz.au> <DAVIS.92Dec14120625@pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu> Sender: news@u.washington.edu (USENET News System) Organization: University of Washington School of Law, Class of '95 Lines: 16