Article View: comp.editors
Article #2604Re: Extension Languages
From: titus
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 19:10
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 19:10
27 lines
1719 bytes
1719 bytes
Craig Durland (craig@cv.hp.com) writes:
>I've done this and it seems like a big win. I didn't use C for the
>language-to-write-editor-extensions and I don't think you want to - C
>is too "low" level for writing extensions in (its great for writing the
>editor itself). Extension writers shouldn't have to worry about memory
>allocation and all the other little details that C requires you to.
>This doesn't have to take lots of memory - I have garbage collection,
>recursion, lists, etc and the total editor size is < 150k (68k Unix).
>The extensions run slower than native C code but that doesn't seem to be
>much of a problem.
I realize that you work for one of their major competitors,
but DEC's TPU (Text PRocessing Utility) offers a real nice
language for implementing editors. You might want to have a
look at it, or the third-party implementation nu/TPU.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mike Titus, Programmer /\ Summer Institute
SIL / \ of
7500 West Camp Wisdom Road /SIL \ Linguistics
Dallas, Texas 75236-5699 --------
U.S.A.
Voice : (214) 709-2400 * Internet <titus@dallas.sil.org>
Facsimile: (214) 709-3387 * UUCP ...utafil!txsil!dalsil!titus
"I can do everything through Him who gives me strength."
Philippians 4:13 (NIV)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec28.131000.79@dallas.sil.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!convex!egsner!lerami!dalsil!titusShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!convex!egsner!lerami!dalsil!titus From: titus@dallas.sil.org Newsgroups: comp.editors Subject: Re: Extension Languages Message-ID: <1992Dec28.131000.79@dallas.sil.org> Date: 28 Dec 92 13:10:00 CST Organization: Summer Institute of Linguistics, Dallas Center Lines: 27