Article View: comp.editors
Article #2625BRIEF, CRISP, EMACS
From: "John E. Davis"
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 17:22
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 17:22
16 lines
1245 bytes
1245 bytes
Am I wrong in assuming that if GNU emacs were available for ALL msdos
machines, with the same power that it has on unix machines, then there would
be less talk about BRIEF and CRISP? It is not my intention to start a flame
war; rather, I'd just like to understand the existing flame war that is
subtly going on. It is my understanding that because of it is impossible to
port GNU emacs to say my XT, BRIEF, CRISP, EPSILON, and others have stepped in
to fulfill this need.
--
_____________
#___/John E. Davis\_________________________________________________________
#
# internet: davis@amy.tch.harvard.edu
# bitnet: davis@ohstpy
# office: 617-735-6746
#
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<DAVIS.92Nov22122214@pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ukma!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!davisShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.editors
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ukma!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!davis
From: davis@pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu ("John E. Davis")
Subject: BRIEF, CRISP, EMACS
Message-ID: <DAVIS.92Nov22122214@pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu>
Sender: news@pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu
Nntp-Posting-Host: pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu
Reply-To: davis@pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu (John E. Davis)
Organization: "Dept. of Physics, The Ohio State University"
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 17:22:14 GMT
Lines: 16