Article View: comp.editors
Article #3138Re: editor
From: Scott Schwartz
Date: Sun, 08 May 1988 20:40
Date: Sun, 08 May 1988 20:40
10 lines
917 bytes
917 bytes
In article <10000006@snail> carroll@snail.CS.UIUC.EDU writes: >>If not, how can anyone tolerate VI? >Lack of choice. It's a lot better than "ed", or "cat". Here is an anecdote for y'all. I know someone who is one of two users on a Sun 4. His editor of choice is ed, even though vi and emacs are available. It does what he wants, as fast as he wants. To each his own, I always say. -- Scott Schwartz schwartz@gondor.cs.psu.edu schwartz@psuvaxg.bitnet
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3568@psuvax1.psu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bbn!rochester!udel!burdvax!psuvax1!gondor.cs.psu.edu!schwartzReferences:
<2266@polyslo.UUCP> <10000006@snail>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bbn!rochester!udel!burdvax!psuvax1!gondor.cs.psu.edu!schwartz From: schwartz@gondor.cs.psu.edu (Scott Schwartz) Newsgroups: comp.editors Subject: Re: editor Message-ID: <3568@psuvax1.psu.edu> Date: 8 May 88 20:40:42 GMT References: <2266@polyslo.UUCP> <10000006@snail> Sender: netnews@psuvax1.psu.edu Reply-To: schwartz@gondor.cs.psu.edu (Scott Schwartz) Organization: Penn State University Lines: 10