Re: EMACS better than Vi?

Article View: comp.editors

Article #3141

#3141

From: Phil Ritzenthaler
Date: Tue, 10 May 1988 16:25

15 lines
952 bytes

In article <52330@sun.uucp>, limes@sun.uucp (Greg Limes) writes:
> 
> Some interesting EMACS features:
> 
>     Compile, toss the errors in a *compilation* window (while you edit
>     something else), and step from error to error in the source code


OK . . . this is one I really like . . . just how do you do this using fortran?

-- 
Phil Ritzenthaler    UUCP :.!cbosgd!osu-cis!bgsuvax!ritzenth 
                     ARPA : ritzenth@andy.bgsu.edu   

"Remember, OPRAH spelled backwards is HARPO (toot-toot)!" -- Anonymous

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2135@bgsuvax.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bgsuvax!ritzenth

References: <449@novavax.UUCP> <10000003@snail> <52207@sun.uucp> <52330@sun.uucp>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bgsuvax!ritzenth
From: ritzenth@bgsuvax.UUCP (Phil Ritzenthaler)
Newsgroups: comp.editors
Subject: Re: EMACS better than Vi?
Message-ID: <2135@bgsuvax.UUCP>
Date: 10 May 88 16:25:32 GMT
References: <449@novavax.UUCP> <10000003@snail> <52207@sun.uucp> <52330@sun.uucp>
Organization: The Land Beneath the Forest Moon of Endor
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message