Article View: comp.editors
Article #3265Re: vi vs. emacs
From: Obnoxious Math Grad Student
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 1988 23:23
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 1988 23:23
13 lines
1179 bytes
1179 bytes
In article <926@buengc.BU.EDU>, bph@buengc (Blair P. Houghton) writes: >As you see above, it was the impossible-to-bother-with, entirely new >and different (read: superfluous) set of commands for the dinging >"info mode" that made me decide that emacs is someone's idea of >full employment for inefficient software engineers. I like Blair. It's people like him who make so many of us feel like such amazing bloody brilliant geniuses, if for at least five minutes a day. Ain't Usenet wonderful? ucbvax!garnet!weemba Matthew P Wiener/Brahms Gang/Berkeley CA 94720
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<13641@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!eos!agate!garnet!weembaReferences:
<2716@mipos3.intel.com> <926@buengc.BU.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!eos!agate!garnet!weemba From: weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student) Newsgroups: comp.editors,alt.flame Subject: Re: vi vs. emacs Message-ID: <13641@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: 26 Aug 88 23:23:29 GMT References: <2716@mipos3.intel.com> <926@buengc.BU.EDU> Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student) Followup-To: alt.flame Organization: Brahms Gang Posting Central Lines: 13 In-reply-to: bph@buengc.BU.EDU (Blair P. Houghton)