Article View: comp.editors
Article #3306Re: Is your editor manly enough to edit itself?
From: Earl H. Kinmonth
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 1988 16:00
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 1988 16:00
7 lines
735 bytes
735 bytes
>>GNU-Emacs, the editor manly enough to edit itself. Don't leave home without >>it. Would anyone like to debate whether "manly" is the appropriate gender term. Since it is both doing and being done too, perhaps "bisexual" or "hermaphroditic" might be a more accurate characterization.... -:)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<14178@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!amdcad!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!agate!garnet.berkeley.edu!kedShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!amdcad!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!agate!garnet.berkeley.edu!ked From: ked@garnet.berkeley.edu (Earl H. Kinmonth) Newsgroups: comp.editors Subject: Re: Is your editor manly enough to edit itself? Keywords: binary editor Message-ID: <14178@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: 12 Sep 88 16:00:30 GMT Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 7