Article View: comp.editors
Article #3311Re: Is your editor manly enough to edit itself?
From: Dave Bozak
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 1988 15:03
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 1988 15:03
6 lines
650 bytes
650 bytes
In article <14178@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> ked@garnet.berkeley.edu (Earl H. Kinmonth) writes: > >Would anyone like to debate whether "manly" is the appropriate >gender term. NO!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<926@oswego.Oswego.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!amdcad!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!sunybcs!oswego!dabReferences:
<14178@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!amdcad!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!sunybcs!oswego!dab From: dab@oswego.Oswego.EDU (Dave Bozak) Newsgroups: comp.editors Subject: Re: Is your editor manly enough to edit itself? Keywords: binary editor Message-ID: <926@oswego.Oswego.EDU> Date: 14 Sep 88 15:03:34 GMT References: <14178@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> Reply-To: dab@oswego.oswego.edu.UUCP (Dave Bozak) Organization: SUNY Oswego Lines: 6