Re: stuff

Article View: comp.editors

Article #3503

#3503

From: Nate Hess
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 1989 18:08

13 lines
976 bytes

In article <1686@wpi.wpi.edu>, jhallen@wpi (Joseph H Allen) writes:
>vi is 4 times less CPU hungry than emacs is.  No way is all of that due to
>EMACS being lispified.  

4 times?  Where did you get that number?  I'd be interested in seeing
your benchmarks.

--woodstock
-- 
	   "What I like is when you're looking and thinking and looking
	   and thinking...and suddenly you wake up."   - Hobbes

woodstock@hobbes.intel.com   ...!{decwrl|hplabs!oliveb}!intelca!mipos3!nate

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3865@mipos3.intel.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!blake!ogccse!littlei!omepd!mipos3!nate

References: <1686@wpi.wpi.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!blake!ogccse!littlei!omepd!mipos3!nate
From: nate@hobbes.intel.com (Nate Hess)
Newsgroups: comp.editors
Subject: Re: stuff
Message-ID: <3865@mipos3.intel.com>
Date: 5 Apr 89 18:08:02 GMT
References: <1686@wpi.wpi.edu>
Sender: news@mipos3.intel.com
Reply-To: woodstock@hobbes.intel.com (Nate Hess)
Organization: Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA
Lines: 13
In-reply-to: jhallen@wpi.wpi.edu (Joseph H Allen)

Reply to Parent Message