Article View: comp.editors
Article #3846Better editors
From: Ilya
Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 00:00
Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 00:00
72 lines
4919 bytes
4919 bytes
Steve Withers (sbwwgtn@ibm.net) wrote: |In <Dr4uyH.2so@postfix.cimpact.nl>, bo@postfix.cimpact.nl (Mailhost Master) writes: > I can see it now, the night before that final paper is due, the one that > needs the graphs and charts, italicizion and bold fonts. What do you do? > Microsoft Word? No. WordPerfect? No. PageMaker? No. You whip > out... vi and LaTeX!!!!! yeah right. You are being sarcastic, right? That is what I do. Vi and nroff or vim and latex or emacs and nroff. Cool stuff. |>[flame on] Oh man, I am so scared now. I better run for my life. (...) |>: >It's time Unix machines moved into the modern age of word processors. |> |>If you run ANY of those so-called "modern age" wordprocessors on |>anything less than a fucking P160, changing a font from "normal" to |>"bold" takes forever. And it won't get any better because all those |>programs are derived from earlier versions simply by adding more sloppy |>code to an already sloppy program. You'll end up with a 1Gb |>wordprocessor that eats ALL your resources while doing NOTHING. Even |>Emacs will laugh at it. Your modern age is 20 years behind Unix. *nod* Thank you for the post, my invisible cyberspace friend. A couple of weeks ago I decided to compose my resume. I went to our Macintosh computer lab, started Word Perfect or another word processor they have on there, forget which. Wanted to make certain words bold and/or underlined. It took me ten minutes to figure out how. No, I am not stupid, but Word Perfect is not a user friendly program and I have not used it for a long time anyway. Typed in the resume. Tried to save in on the floppy disk and froze the machine. Rebooted it. Got frustrated, gave up and went to the Unix lab, fired up emacs and my mind was like "Aahhh". Pure editing satisfaction. Retyped the resume in about five minutes, formatted the file with nroff and was done. Unix computers do not freeze like Machintoshes. They do a lot of bad things, they crash, but they have never stolen my resume from me. I am not an experienced Macintosh user but then Macs are not designed for experienced users and do not have a steep learning curve. I have seen people "freeze" Macs and I have done it myself a few times over the years. Some of these problems occured entirely because of my errors and some were not. A computer or a software package that freezes for whatever reason is absolutely unacceptable. This is the reason I despise Macs among many other things in life. I was upset that day I lost my resume and 20 mitutes of my life. Little things like that terribly frustrate and upset me, albeit for short periods of time. I still use Macs sometimes just because they are different from what I am used to. They are fine, high-quality machines and when they perform as they should and do not disappoint me, they are great. Eventually I retyped the resume with Word on a Mac and it decided to be nice to me and did not "freeze". I suppose I should thank the computer for it. If our Unix lab had a laser printer like the Mac lab, I would certainly do it in emacs on a Sun worstation because it is the best combination I have ever encountered. Why I am posting this? I dunno. You figure it out. ========================================================================== Ilya Beloozerov Email: ibelooze@runet.edu Public PGP key is available at http://www.cs.runet.edu/~ibelooze This message is sponsored by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. ==========================================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4nrqg2$eek@newslink.runet.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10cbb9,c5e58db146e51da8,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10cbb9,public X-Google-Thread: 107393,c5e58db146e51da8,start X-Google-Attributes: gid107393,public X-Google-Thread: 111731,c5e58db146e51da8,start X-Google-Attributes: gid111731,public X-Google-Thread: 102b9a,c5e58db146e51da8,start X-Google-Attributes: gid102b9a,public X-Google-Thread: 10e6b9,c5e58db146e51da8,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10e6b9,public X-Google-Thread: 10e148,c5e58db146e51da8,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10e148,public X-Google-Thread: 106243,c5e58db146e51da8,start X-Google-Attributes: gid106243,public X-Google-Thread: 103b8b,c5e58db146e51da8,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103b8b,public From: ibelooze@runet.edu (Ilya) Subject: Better editors Date: 1996/05/21 Message-ID: <4nrqg2$eek@newslink.runet.edu> X-Deja-AN: 155887656 distribution: inet organization: Radford University newsgroups: comp.editors,comp.unix.advocacy,comp.emacs,comp.emacs.xemacs,gnu.emacs,gnu.emacs.help,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.printing,comp.unix.user-friendly