🚀 go-pugleaf

DvdS@eden.com  (David Vanderschel) writes:

[...]

>It strikes me that there is a problem with comp.emacs that deserves to
>be addressed.  comp.emacs is *mostly* about GNU emacs.  However, there
[...]
>emacs theme.  It would make sense to me to split comp.emacs into, say,

>comp.emacs-gnu, and
>comp.emacs-other

I've never had access to emacs on any *nix system I've used, so I've
only ever had one brief visit in comp.emacs.

But it seems to me that a split for comp.emacs like this needs to be
done as a separate thing, initiated from within the group.  From what
you are saying, it does seem like a good idea.

There has been some suggestion about doing this:

comp.editors.emacs-gnu
comp.editors.emacs-other
comp.editors.emacs.xemacs

that is, making emacs a subgroup of comp.editors.

(Just an _idea_! :)

So, anyone in {comp,gnu}.emacs want to get the ball rolling on this?

[I've left the crosspost into the three newsgroups alone, but perhaps
any followups about this should trim out comp.editors from now on?? ]

Cheers
Tony
-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-
T.Nugent@sct.gu.edu.au    tnugent@cit.gu.edu.au     tony@sctnugen.ppp.gu.edu.au