Article View: comp.editors
Article #4009Re: is it really worth the time to go from vi to emacs?
From: Andries Kruithof
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 00:00
60 lines
2690 bytes
2690 bytes
In article <jimhill.835463897@kitsune>, jimhill@swcp.com (Jim Hill) writes: |> changj@jeff-lab@queensu.ca (Jianlin Chang) writes: |> |>>I am considering learning emacs after using vi for a long time. Is |>>the time spend on learning really worth the benefits of emacs vs vi? |>>Thanks a lot. |> |> Sure. The power and flexibility that emacs gives you makes it well |> worth knowing. That said, I'm having a hell of a time making the switch |> myself because editing in vi requires no conscious effort. My emacs |> documents tend to have a lot of jjjjj's or :wq's in them just from force |> of habit. |> |> The hardest part of making the switch, at least for me, is not trying |> to learn/remember all of emacs's commands; there are only a handful |> that you _need_ to know upfront. The hardest part is overcoming the |> subconscious. |> |> Jim |> -- |> jimhill@swcp.com http://www.swcp.com/~jimhill/ |> |> "Iced tea keeps me in a summertime frame of mind." -- Meldrick Lewis I too think it is worth the time learning emacs. I've got the version for X-windows, with the menubar on it, which is great when learning all the different things :) The biggest problem I had was indeed finding out this handful of commands which are essential. Maybe this is a good question for the FAQ: what are the basic commands one needs to know, before one can use emacs? An answer could be: C-x C-f load file C-x k kill buffer C-x C-s save file C-x C-c quit emacs C-s Search C-h b list key-bindings C-h a command apropos Well, these are the commands I learned to use first YMMV. Andries -- ------------------------------------------ Andries Kruithof kruithof@slb.com Geco-Prakla Kongeveien 79, N-3196 Horten (Norway) These opinions are my own, not necessarily those of my employer ------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4qlah5$mek@ohnasn01.sinet.slb.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4qf5lo$lhk@knot.queensu.ca> <jimhill.835463897@kitsune>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 102b9a,51d854ca9043b00f X-Google-Attributes: gid102b9a,public X-Google-Thread: 103b8b,51d854ca9043b00f X-Google-Attributes: gid103b8b,public X-Google-Thread: 107393,51d854ca9043b00f X-Google-Attributes: gid107393,public From: kruithof@horten.geco-prakla.slb.com (Andries Kruithof) Subject: Re: is it really worth the time to go from vi to emacs? Date: 1996/06/24 Message-ID: <4qlah5$mek@ohnasn01.sinet.slb.com> X-Deja-AN: 161945398 distribution: inet references: <4qf5lo$lhk@knot.queensu.ca> <jimhill.835463897@kitsune> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Schlumberger mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.editors,comp.emacs,gnu.emacs.help