Article View: comp.editors
Article #3133Re: EMACS better than Vi?
From: Jonathan Payne
Date: Sun, 08 May 1988 06:36
Date: Sun, 08 May 1988 06:36
17 lines
1271 bytes
1271 bytes
Several peopling keep making a point which is slightly "annoying" to me, which is, if all you want to do is simple editing then don't worry about the fact that you are using VI. I don't use EMACS, I use JOVE, and so I don't use any of the complicated features of emacs. Instead I use the basic features I have come to take for granted, like multiple buffers, more than one window, interactive shells, automatic compilation and error/grep parsing capabilities. JOVE is smaller than VI, so you don't need huge, slow programs to get a lot of the nice functionality that I have come to take for granted. The thought of using an editor which only lets me have one buffer at a time is just horrifying ... VI is good for sending mail and news, but forget it if you are writing a paper, a program, or anything else that isn't mail or news. Jonathan Payne P.S. Yes, I'm biased, I know.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9498@sol.ARPA>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bbn!rochester!jpayneReferences:
<3242@enea.se>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bbn!rochester!jpayne From: jpayne@cs.rochester.edu (Jonathan Payne) Newsgroups: comp.editors Subject: Re: EMACS better than Vi? Message-ID: <9498@sol.ARPA> Date: 8 May 88 06:36:54 GMT References: <3242@enea.se> Reply-To: jpayne@cs.rochester.edu (Jonathan Payne) Organization: U of Rochester, CS Dept, Rochester, NY Lines: 17