Thread View: comp.editors
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Stefan Fuenfrocken
Wed, 27 Jan 1993 09:05
"too dangerous to map that"
Author: Stefan Fuenfrocken
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 09:05
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 09:05
44 lines
2106 bytes
2106 bytes
Hi,
Under what circumstance do i get the " too dangerous to map that" message?
There were a few times vi refused to map something.
e.g. perform search for fixed patten
:map xx /pattern
Does this mean, that i probably will run into conflict with 'internal' vi mappings?
Is there a way to do the mapping anyway.
e.g: space bar mapping (well, bad example, since it is not too dangerous to map ;) )
map ^V something
an then redefine the mappings for 's' and '~', which use the spacebar-mapping,
accordingly with the 'l' as substitute.
Another question:
-) is there a way to use the 'unmapped' meaning of mapped symbols?
suppose you map! the ESC-key to somthing (a stupid thing, i know ;) ), which
leaves you with (almost) no possibility to return from any insert/appand/open mode;
the only thing a can imagine, is to map! an other key to ESC ( with noremap set,
otherwise: no chance).
-) how can i unmap ALL my map and/or map! mappings at once?
Do i really have to write an according unmap file wich successivly unmaps
all my .exrc-mappings, and map \um to :so ~/.unmap ?
Thanx for your time
Stefan.
--
Stefan Fuenfrocken, University of Saarland, FB14 - Prof. Mattern, Im Stadtwald 36,
W-6600 Saarbruecken, Germany, (+49) 681/302-4576, fuenf@cs.uni-sb.de
+Only skydivers know why birds sing+
| \o/ \|/
|=> (( --O--
| \\ /|\
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads