Article View: comp.emacs
Article #3266Re: Does DEMACS work reliably for anyone?
From: Patteaswaran
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 18:35
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 18:35
49 lines
2730 bytes
2730 bytes
Hi Emacs-loving-folks, In article <1992Dec20.173946.20445@super.org> pcolsen@super.org (Peter C Olsen) writes: > >Does DEMACS work --- reliably? I would appreciate email from anyone >who has experience, either way. I have been trying to use DEMACS, but >I have been unable to get it to work reliably. It seems to be very >sensitive to other software, either refusing to run or running >"poorly" --- e.g. ignoring characters or doubling them. Then, when it >appears to be running well, it often hangs at odd times, losing my >recent work. Emacs is my favorite editor (by far) in the unix >environment, and I had hoped to use it extensively in DOS, but, so >far, I am still relying on BRIEF simply because I can't depend on >DEMACS. > >Peter About a week back I got a copy of DEMACS from the UC Berkely ftp site and have been using it really successfully. I find that it is great. Eventhough I did not attempt at doing a full QA of the S/W, I did use it reasonably well. I have to admit that I was using the S/W with a little bit of caution as you do with any new S/W. I don't claim that it is perfect or anything, but in my opinion it looked pretty stable. Like, once I used it for one full day from the morning to evening without getting out of the Emacs session and it went fine. I used all the basic editing features like yank, put, indent, enhanced-dired, etc. At times I had more than 10 buffers( read files ) during the session. I even did compilations from within the demacs session. I ran the Borland C++ 3.1 'bcc' command line compiler from within demacs and it went fine. Actually I used most of the main editing features that a programmer will be using in his day-to-day work. Of course, all of us using the demacs will feel much more secure if someone could give us some QA results, or directs us to some kind of a QA suite which we can run for ourselves and feel secure. Thanks, Easwaran (If you are emailing to me, please do send a copy to the following address too : easwar@ravitech.com ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I am speaking for myself and opnions expressed here are my own. - Easwaran ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5389@calmasd.Prime.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!network.ucsd.edu!calmasd!kepReferences:
<1992Dec20.173946.20445@super.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!network.ucsd.edu!calmasd!kep From: kep@calmasd.Prime.COM (Patteaswaran) Newsgroups: comp.emacs Subject: Re: Does DEMACS work reliably for anyone? Keywords: demacs, brief, unix, msdos, editors Message-ID: <5389@calmasd.Prime.COM> Date: 22 Dec 92 18:35:31 GMT References: <1992Dec20.173946.20445@super.org> Organization: Computervision, San Diego, CA Lines: 52