🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.emacs
Article #3266

Re: Does DEMACS work reliably for anyone?

#3266
From: Patteaswaran
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 18:35
49 lines
2730 bytes
Hi Emacs-loving-folks,

In article <1992Dec20.173946.20445@super.org> pcolsen@super.org (Peter C Olsen) writes:
>
>Does DEMACS work --- reliably?  I would appreciate email from anyone
>who has experience, either way. I have been trying to use DEMACS, but
>I have been unable to get it to work reliably.  It seems to be very
>sensitive to other software, either refusing to run or running
>"poorly" --- e.g. ignoring characters or doubling them.  Then, when it
>appears to be running well, it often hangs at odd times, losing my
>recent work.  Emacs is my favorite editor (by far) in the unix
>environment, and I had hoped to use it extensively in DOS, but, so
>far, I am still relying on BRIEF simply because I can't depend on
>DEMACS.
>
>Peter

About a week back I got a copy of DEMACS from the UC Berkely ftp site and
have been using it really successfully. I find that it is great.
Eventhough I did not attempt at doing a full QA of the S/W, I did use it
reasonably well. I have to admit that I was using the S/W with a
little bit of caution as you do with any new S/W. I don't claim that
it is perfect or anything, but in my opinion it looked pretty stable.

Like, once I used it for one full day from the morning to evening without
getting out of the Emacs session and it went fine. I used all the basic
editing features like yank, put, indent, enhanced-dired, etc.  At times I had
more than 10 buffers( read files ) during the session. I even did compilations
from within the demacs session. I ran the Borland C++ 3.1 'bcc' command
line compiler from within demacs and it went fine. Actually I used most of the
main editing features that a programmer will be using in his day-to-day
work.

Of course, all of us using the demacs will feel much more secure if someone
could give us some QA results, or directs us to some kind of a QA suite
which we can run for ourselves and feel secure.

Thanks,

Easwaran
(If you are emailing to me, please do send a copy to the following address
too :      
	easwar@ravitech.com
)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am speaking for myself and opnions expressed here are my own.
- Easwaran
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID: <5389@calmasd.Prime.COM>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!network.ucsd.edu!calmasd!kep
References: <1992Dec20.173946.20445@super.org>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!network.ucsd.edu!calmasd!kep
From: kep@calmasd.Prime.COM (Patteaswaran)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: Does DEMACS work reliably for anyone?
Keywords: demacs, brief, unix, msdos, editors
Message-ID: <5389@calmasd.Prime.COM>
Date: 22 Dec 92 18:35:31 GMT
References: <1992Dec20.173946.20445@super.org>
Organization: Computervision, San Diego, CA
Lines: 52