Article View: comp.emacs
Article #7981Re: Micro-emacs question
From: T. Moody
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 1988 03:47
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 1988 03:47
47 lines
2541 bytes
2541 bytes
In article <8335@j.cc.purdue.edu> nwd@j.cc.purdue.edu (Daniel Lawrence) writes:
> M-^X set $replace ""
>
> put this command line in a macro and bind it to a key.
Thanks, I'll do it.
> Between 3.9p and 3.10 the syntax for specifying function keys
>changed. Rather than the cryptic IBM-PC key scan codes that were being
>used, 3.10 now uses a standard machine independant set of codes.
I'm embarrassed. When I took a closer look at the new emacs.rc file, I
noticed the change at once. Well, thanks for changing it; it certainly
makes things easier to read.
>----=====FLAME ON====-----
> Yes, the document is big. But on other hand, so is the program
>it is describing. I and a lot of others spend a lot of time assisting
>people in setting up and using this program and others and it really
>irks me when I have to waste time describing things that I have already
>painstakingly documented in the manual. Yes it costs to download from
>Indiana... but good lord, the program is FREE! So instead here we are
>taking up beucoup bucks on lots of machines across the nation instead to
>spread these requests/answers around USENET.
Guilty. In fact, I could not download the docs anyway. What I can't
afford yet is a new modem. My old one was smitten by lightning. At 300
baud, the doc file would far exceed my time privileges at the
Programmer's Room. If I had 1200 baud again, I simply would have
downloaded the file. But this is not your problem. Your irritation is
justified; I simply want to register the point that I was not
*complaining* about the size of the docs. On the contrary, the
documentation for micro-emacs is a welcome exception to the rule of
sparse or unintelligible documentation for non-commercial (and many
comercial) programs. If the file were tiny, there would be something to
complain about.
> Thanx Todd and all for letting me babble,
> Daniel Lawrence
I think you've earned it.
--
Todd Moody * {allegra|astrovax|bpa|burdvax}!sjuvax!tmoody * SJU Phil. Dept.
"The mind-forg'd manacles I hear." -- William Blake
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1715@sjuvax.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cbmvax!bpa!sjuvax!tmoodyReferences:
<1712@sjuvax.UUCP> <8335@j.cc.purdue.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cbmvax!bpa!sjuvax!tmoody From: tmoody@sjuvax.UUCP (T. Moody) Newsgroups: comp.emacs Subject: Re: Micro-emacs question Summary: thanks, embarrassed Keywords: uEMACS docs Message-ID: <1715@sjuvax.UUCP> Date: 28 Nov 88 03:47:42 GMT References: <1712@sjuvax.UUCP> <8335@j.cc.purdue.edu> Reply-To: tmoody@sjuvax.UUCP (T. Moody) Organization: St. Joseph's University, Phila. PA. Lines: 47