Re: Gnu Emacs Mail Flag

Article View: comp.emacs

Article #8127

#8127

From: Matt Crawford
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 1988 21:23

12 lines
1066 bytes

The trouble seems to be that GNU emacs does not provide a way to send an
arbitrary signal to a process.  (In this case, SIGALRM.)  To provide
such a mechanism might reduce portability, at least I suppose that's why
it isn't already there.

A somewhat more portable alternative might be to have the "loadst"
program do a select() on fd 0 with a timeout of 60 seconds (or whatever
value is given by argv).  If you want to tickle loadst sooner, send the
display-time process a byte of input.

Comments?
				Matt Crawford

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1184@tank.uchicago.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ncar!tank!oddjob!matt

References: <12096@hall.cray.com> <33512@bbn.COM> <1988Dec15.050335.1870@cs.rochester.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ncar!tank!oddjob!matt
From: matt@oddjob.uchicago.edu (Matt Crawford)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: Gnu Emacs Mail Flag
Message-ID: <1184@tank.uchicago.edu>
Date: 15 Dec 88 21:23:25 GMT
References: <12096@hall.cray.com> <33512@bbn.COM> <1988Dec15.050335.1870@cs.rochester.edu>
Sender: news@tank.uchicago.edu
Reply-To: matt@oddjob.uchicago.edu (Matt Crawford)
Distribution: na
Organization: Backwards R Us
Lines: 11
In-reply-to: quiroz@cs.rochester.edu (Cesar Quiroz)

Reply to Parent Message