Re: Is a GNUemacs function defined?

Article View: comp.emacs

Article #8242

#8242

From: Matt Crawford
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 1989 19:20

5 lines
809 bytes

Ashwin's reply about using provide and require is the correct solution,
but in case you sometimes really do need to decide whether a function is
defined, use (fboundp 'SYMBOL):  T if SYMBOL's function definition is
not void.
			Matt Crawford

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1306@tank.uchicago.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!xanth!nic.MR.NET!shamash!tank!oddjob!matt

References: <2941@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!xanth!nic.MR.NET!shamash!tank!oddjob!matt
From: matt@oddjob.uchicago.edu (Matt Crawford)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: Is a GNUemacs function defined?
Keywords: GNU lisp
Message-ID: <1306@tank.uchicago.edu>
Date: 6 Jan 89 19:20:01 GMT
References: <2941@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu>
Sender: news@tank.uchicago.edu
Reply-To: matt@oddjob.uchicago.edu (Matt Crawford)
Organization: Si me quieres escribir, ya sabes mi paradero
Lines: 5
In-reply-to: lupton@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu (Robert Lupton)

Reply to Parent Message