Re: font flames

Article View: comp.fonts

Article #3043

#3043

From: Rich Salz
Date: Tue, 10 May 1988 15:01

8 lines
617 bytes

Deliberately taken out of context:
    > Nothing wrong
    >with it, but nothing to really draw your attention to it. 
Sounds to me like the font in question is a wild success, in at
least one area.
	/r$
-- 
Please send comp.sources.unix-related mail to rsalz@uunet.uu.net.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <720@fig.bbn.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bbn!bbn.com!rsalz

References: <52552@sun.uucp> <12840@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <52617@sun.uucp>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bbn!bbn.com!rsalz
From: rsalz@bbn.com (Rich Salz)
Newsgroups: comp.fonts
Subject: Re: font flames
Message-ID: <720@fig.bbn.com>
Date: 10 May 88 15:01:00 GMT
References: <52552@sun.uucp> <12840@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <52617@sun.uucp>
Organization: BBN Laboratories Inc., Cambridge MA
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message