comp.fonts

Article View: comp.fonts

Article #495

#495

From: Richard Sexton
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1989 08:52

9 lines
792 bytes

Back when I held the vote for comp.fonts, it seemed that
``anybody who was anybody'' on the NET voted against it.

I'd like to know if anybody still feels the group is a 
bad idea.

-- 
                  Surgical tools for mutant women
richard@gryphon.COM  decwrl!gryphon!richard   gryphon!richard@elroy.jpl.NASA.GOV

Technical Details

Message-ID: <21155@gryphon.COM>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!usc!henry.jpl.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!gryphon!richard

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!usc!henry.jpl.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!gryphon!richard
From: richard@gryphon.COM (Richard Sexton)
Newsgroups: comp.fonts,news.groups,news.misc
Subject: comp.fonts
Keywords: question
Message-ID: <21155@gryphon.COM>
Date: 21 Oct 89 08:52:00 GMT
Followup-To: richard@gryphon.com
Organization: Trailing Edge Technology, Redondo Beach, Ca.
Lines: 9