🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.fonts
Article #577

Re: SWFTE Typecase

#577
From: Jonathan Gilligan 303-497-3861
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 22:58
18 lines
1270 bytes
In article <oneil.713599413@cwis> oneil@cwis.unomaha.edu (Sharon O'Neil) writes:
>For most purposes, one would want to use a 12 point type anyway.  In my
>opinion, even 10 is a bit small for most purposes because it is somewhat
>difficult to read.

But if your principle text is set in 12 point, then super and
subscripts will be set at a smaller size (typically 9 pt or so), as
will footnotes. Super and subscripts in footnotes will be set at a
smaller size (about 6 pt). Since I do a lot of technical typesetting
(lots of equations), a document set with 12 pt type for the principal
face will contain lots of 9 pt and 6 pt type, so it's necessary to
have good-looking type at far smaller sizes than I use for the main
text.

---Jon
-- 

Disclaimer --- The government probably disagrees with my opinions.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4811@dove.nist.gov>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!mips!darwin.sura.net!dove!gilligan
References: <oneil.713506248@cwis> <1992Aug11.192707.29682@ll.mit.edu> <oneil.713599413@cwis>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!mips!darwin.sura.net!dove!gilligan
From: gilligan@bldrdoc.gov (Jonathan Gilligan 303-497-3861)
Newsgroups: comp.fonts
Subject: Re: SWFTE Typecase
Message-ID: <4811@dove.nist.gov>
Date: 12 Aug 92 22:58:30 GMT
References: <oneil.713506248@cwis> <1992Aug11.192707.29682@ll.mit.edu> <oneil.713599413@cwis>
Sender: news@dove.nist.gov
Organization: National Institute of Standards and Technology
Lines: 18