Article View: comp.fonts
Article #577Re: SWFTE Typecase
From: Jonathan Gilligan 303-497-3861
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 22:58
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 22:58
18 lines
1270 bytes
1270 bytes
In article <oneil.713599413@cwis> oneil@cwis.unomaha.edu (Sharon O'Neil) writes: >For most purposes, one would want to use a 12 point type anyway. In my >opinion, even 10 is a bit small for most purposes because it is somewhat >difficult to read. But if your principle text is set in 12 point, then super and subscripts will be set at a smaller size (typically 9 pt or so), as will footnotes. Super and subscripts in footnotes will be set at a smaller size (about 6 pt). Since I do a lot of technical typesetting (lots of equations), a document set with 12 pt type for the principal face will contain lots of 9 pt and 6 pt type, so it's necessary to have good-looking type at far smaller sizes than I use for the main text. ---Jon -- Disclaimer --- The government probably disagrees with my opinions.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4811@dove.nist.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!mips!darwin.sura.net!dove!gilliganReferences:
<oneil.713506248@cwis> <1992Aug11.192707.29682@ll.mit.edu> <oneil.713599413@cwis>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!mips!darwin.sura.net!dove!gilligan From: gilligan@bldrdoc.gov (Jonathan Gilligan 303-497-3861) Newsgroups: comp.fonts Subject: Re: SWFTE Typecase Message-ID: <4811@dove.nist.gov> Date: 12 Aug 92 22:58:30 GMT References: <oneil.713506248@cwis> <1992Aug11.192707.29682@ll.mit.edu> <oneil.713599413@cwis> Sender: news@dove.nist.gov Organization: National Institute of Standards and Technology Lines: 18