Article View: comp.fonts
Article #597Re: SWFTE Typecase
From: Sharon O'Neil
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 00:50
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 00:50
45 lines
2710 bytes
2710 bytes
dhosek@hmcvax.claremont.edu writes: >In article <4811@dove.nist.gov>, gilligan@bldrdoc.gov (Jonathan Gilligan 303-497-3861) writes: >> In article <oneil.713599413@cwis> oneil@cwis.unomaha.edu (Sharon O'Neil) writes: >>>For most purposes, one would want to use a 12 point type anyway. In my >>>opinion, even 10 is a bit small for most purposes because it is somewhat >>>difficult to read. > >> But if your principle text is set in 12 point, then super and >> subscripts will be set at a smaller size (typically 9 pt or so), as >> will footnotes. Super and subscripts in footnotes will be set at a >> smaller size (about 6 pt). Since I do a lot of technical typesetting >> (lots of equations), a document set with 12 pt type for the principal >> face will contain lots of 9 pt and 6 pt type, so it's necessary to >> have good-looking type at far smaller sizes than I use for the main >> text. First of all, I rarely, if ever, have the need to use superscripts or subscripts. (I generally use the MLA format for writing papers, which eliminates the need for footnotes. I cite author and page parenthetically. >To further muddy the waters, I would claim that other than >single-column printing on US Letter paper or A4, 12 pt is >distinctly too large for most text applications. For most of my purposes, 12 point is just about right. I almost never have the need for a font smaller than that. I have just about perfect vision and I think that an 8 or 10 point letter looks like you're trying to cram something on the page. (For word-processed or desktop published documents.) >On the other >hand, with most of the piece-of-crud editing facilities provided >by WYSIWYG systems, anything smaller than 12pt is distinctly >illegible on-screen (gosh, what a surprise, the typography for >on-screen viewing at 70-100dpi is different than that for >printing at 300+dpi!) so perhaps that's the driving force. Sigh. >Anyway, you'll be hard pressed to find many books aimed at adult >readers typeset entirely in 12pt and larger. A book is /not/ the same as a word-processed or desktop-published document. Sharon O'Neil oneil@cwis.unomaha.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<oneil.714012630@cwis>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.unomaha.edu!cwis!oneilReferences:
<oneil.713506248@cwis> <1992Aug11.192707.29682@ll.mit.edu> <oneil.713599413@cwis> <4811@dove.nist.gov> <1992Aug16.141102.1@hmcvax.claremont.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.fonts Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.unomaha.edu!cwis!oneil From: oneil@cwis.unomaha.edu (Sharon O'Neil) Subject: Re: SWFTE Typecase Message-ID: <oneil.714012630@cwis> Sender: news@news.unomaha.edu (UNO Network News Server) Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha References: <oneil.713506248@cwis> <1992Aug11.192707.29682@ll.mit.edu> <oneil.713599413@cwis> <4811@dove.nist.gov> <1992Aug16.141102.1@hmcvax.claremont.edu> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 00:50:30 GMT Lines: 47