Article View: comp.graphics.animation
Article #773Re: GRAPHICS BBS...why bother with JPEG anymore?
From: Kouhia Juhana
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 11:00
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 11:00
25 lines
1362 bytes
1362 bytes
In article <1993Jan7.200849.7021@brtph560.bnr.ca> ppaglia@bnr.ca (Peter Paglia P925) writes: > >One of the amazing aspects of fractal compression is that the >decompression is resolution independant. A 100x100 gif can be >displayed at 320x200 without pixelization (blockiness). Wait a minute... If the original image is 100x100, then to 200x200 image the edges or such must be estimated -- but can do it independently to jpg or any image. Even you saw details in 200x200 fractal compressed image, the actual image may not contain those details. But because fractal system (IFS) simulates real objects (like tree) appropriately, you may get just simulated details to image. So, what is the current method to make fractal compression? Does it use collage theorem (i.e. ready made simulated objects or such). Juhana Kouhia
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1ijms5INNh8c@cc.tut.fi>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!news.funet.fi!butler.cc.tut.fi!lehtori.cc.tut.fi!not-for-mailReferences:
<1993Jan7.200849.7021@brtph560.bnr.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!news.funet.fi!butler.cc.tut.fi!lehtori.cc.tut.fi!not-for-mail From: jk87377@lehtori.cc.tut.fi (Kouhia Juhana) Newsgroups: comp.graphics.animation,sci.fractals Subject: Re: GRAPHICS BBS...why bother with JPEG anymore? Date: 8 Jan 1993 13:00:21 +0200 Organization: Tampere University of Technology Lines: 25 Distribution: inet Message-ID: <1ijms5INNh8c@cc.tut.fi> References: <1993Jan7.200849.7021@brtph560.bnr.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: cc.tut.fi Keywords: JPEG FIF FRACTAL