Arguments to cxGeoScale ??

Article View: comp.graphics.explorer

Article #143

Back to comp.graphics.explorer Previous Next

#143

From: Chris Ross
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1992 16:51

19 lines
912 bytes

Explorer guys:

The Module Builder's guide defines these transformation routines
as:
    cxGeo cxGeoScale(float x, float y, float z)
    cxGeo cxGeoRotate(float theta, float x, float y, float z)

but in <cx/Geometry.h> they're prototyped as:

void cxGeoRotate(float,float,float,float,float,float,float);
void cxGeoScale(float,float,float,float,float,float);

Which is right and what are the extra arguments?

Chris
--
Chris Ross
ross@orion.nrl.navy.mil
Naval Research Lab, Washington, DC

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3857@ra.nrl.navy.mil>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!usenet.coe.montana.edu!caen!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!ra!ross

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!usenet.coe.montana.edu!caen!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!ra!ross
From: ross@orion.nrl.navy.mil (Chris Ross)
Newsgroups: comp.graphics.explorer
Subject: Arguments to cxGeoScale ??
Message-ID: <3857@ra.nrl.navy.mil>
Date: 6 Oct 92 16:51:47 GMT
Article-I.D.: ra.3857
Sender: usenet@ra.nrl.navy.mil
Organization: Naval Research Lab, Washington, DC
Lines: 19